- Open Access
Cross-cultural study the macro variables and its impact on exchange rate regimes
Future Business Journal volume 9, Article number: 9 (2023)
This is an empirical analysis of study simultaneously focus on examining the impact of macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves on the exchange rate regimes, using the sample of five countries from MSCI developed markets index, emerging markets index and frontier markets index each from 1970 to 2020. This study predicts and provides several essential contributions for markets, financial and economic, that fills the gaps in the markets economic and financial literacy of desired countries. The study identifies and evaluates the impact using the most advanced statistical frameworks. This study adopts ML—binary logit (quadratic hill climbing) and investigates the change in the exchange rate regimes due to macroeconomic variables. The empirical results confirm that Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore markets take timely correct exchange rate regimes decisions, which lead to developed markets. As emerging markets and frontier markets never adopt the exchange rate regimes three, four, and six, which is a significant impact factor that affects those markets never growth according develops markets. Foreign debts, inflation and foreign reserves are severe challenges for emerging and frontier markets.
Background of the study
An exchange rate is a rate in which one country, like Pakistan currency, is exchanged for the other countries’ currencies like US dollar, euro . In twentieth century, most countries in the world currency determine with fixed exchange rates rather than specified by the marketplace. World War 1 countries currency set as gold worth. In World War 2, the select money mode again changed. Most countries' currency value is fixed as US dollar terms and equilibrium in exchange rate determined by the foreign exchange market as demand–supply currency equates .
As well as mostly countries’ currencies followed the link through Bretton Woods’s system with British Sterling Pound till 1970, but when failing of the Bretton woods system, the exchange rate of the regime changed across most world countries. Most countries adopted a floating exchange rate and did not allow them to freely move the nominal exchange rate until they feared floating . The world's central bank was responsible for maintaining the exchange rate, where countries adopted the fixed exchange rate. The exchange rate was fixed by buying and selling currencies for maintains the demand and supply in currencies markets. In 1973, the floating exchange rate was made nominal, which investors discouraged due to risk exchange rate fluctuations. After World War 2, US influence increased in the international marketplace. In 1971, most countries linked currency with the US dollar. Political relationship and instability affected the currency devaluation .
The empirical investigation suggests the existence of a large UGE can decrease the revenues (tax), depress the GDP and increase the social-economic problems. Tax evasion has a negative relationship fiscal and monetary policy of Pakistan, and an increase revenue (tax) audit ratio may minimize the size of countries' economies . The impact of devaluation was experienced for the next seven years on financial factors like fiscal deficit, inflation, circular debt, taxes, interest rate and economy . Exchange rate depreciation improves the balance of payment to reduce the growth rate of countries. Credit and fiscal policies to affect demand aggregate, authorities or government can influence the economic activity. Supply position determines the level and growth rate of employment and output. Eventually, the government will move to alter the domestic currency value of foreign exchange. Policies as the natural variables revert the economy to equilibrium Positions . Past financial crisis major developed countries affected and remain weak as even nonexistent, exchange rate policies of some countries led as accentuating the imbalance of world and create hurdles against the recovery of the world economy .
The economic approach emphasizes the role of economic leverage undervaluation. It is still a powerful cyclical instrument and employed with precautionary to be internationally and globally consistent. The misalignment index plays a crucial role in reversing the growing trend. The undervaluation of their currency positively acts on their growth . The change in the shadow economy size reflected the shift in monetary indicators. An increase in the shadow economy activity is likely to push up the currency demand of Pakistan . The researcher found was the currency exchange rate had a positive impact on the economic growth of Pakistan. Exchange rate and inflation have a significant adverse effect on Pakistan economic growth. Decrease GDP will increase inflation as GDP reduces when the exchange rate increases. The result indicates that foreign direct investment, exchange rate and inflation have a significant effect on the economy as the capital stock has no significant impact on the economic growth of Pakistan. Direct foreign investments have a positive relationship with GDP .
The exchange rate on growth and domestic prices of all nominal variables (other than exchange rate) are endogenous and temporarily affect the equilibrium, as well as demand management policies, which can increase the growth rate of output and employment at the cost of domestic price and external deficits increases. There is no severe damage to growth during high inflation crises, and most countries recovery trend their actual growth rate . Interest rates and inflation harm economic growth . The literature has evidence which not only evaluates the relationship between misalignment and development but also has a link with growth sources like foreign direct investment and growth, among others. The mostly world countries used currency to attempt foreign direct investment inflow influence from countries for using against the weak currency. Cash flows were led to the presence of countries foreign direct investments, and a study was found the negative impact of exchange rate volatility on direct investment .
Devaluation wills disfavor the trade balance, inflation in the cause of Pakistan and economic growth . The relationship between gold prices represents commodity money system and fiat money as stability of economic indicators. Both approaches have no proper representations, not very significant against each other as inflation on macroeconomic variables. The commodity-based money system is not working free of inflation. The commodity money system is effective in the dynamic country's economic growth and, on the contrary, fiat money. The gold money base system is more reliable and creates high economic growth in the country . The study result shows that currency redenomination is beneficial for country growth in Ghana . The researcher analyzes and predicts the currency valuation factors. In Asia, only Pakistan exports are the suitable predictor of the currency valuation . Researcher uses the monetary performance affected by exchange rate and inflation. Exchange rate was used policy in general, and currency devaluation like japan was most successful for stability . This shows results that sustainable corporate social responsibility is the leading factor that enhances the firm performance . Money supplies maintain the economic growth and stability of the fixed exchange rate . Post-Bretton woods float exchange rate dynamics affected due to global prices . Latest studies provide detail investigation relationship exchange rate regimes and macroeconomic variable GDP, trade and inflation [20, 23]. Exchange rate depreciation was a well anticipated in low inflation with reserve loss .
Statement of the problem
Empirical studied observed possible devaluation effect. Most developing countries used devaluation as a policy instruments. This study will investigate the devaluation (exchange rate effect and relationship on macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves for two reasons: First, the developing countries like Pakistan have currency short story of exchange rate usage adjustments as a policy tool to attract the external competitiveness. Since 1970, Pakistan devaluated its currency where continuously like other developing countries. ETB exchange rate is adjusted rather than sound judgments. Second, governments are heavily dependent on agricultural manufacturing industries and import goods that affect output. A large number of studies conducted on the impact of exchange rate on the economy mostly considered exchange rate channel while macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves implications of currency adjustments, are commonly overlooked. Production and exports are highly heterogeneous; export orientation dependency and import increase the dependence and liabilities of dollarization. The empirical evidence mixed effect of currency adjustments on economic growth (output) and government development approaches, as industries like manufacturing are the main engine of countries economic growth, is the best possible suggestion to guide policy directions. Early empirical studies used a simple method like ordinary least squares to measure the effects of exchange rate instability. Most popular cultural analysis has time-series econometrics . However, the most recent evidence identifies the use of some macroeconomic in the present study which had nonlinear relationship found, which were generated by nonlinear processes. This study assumed the entire variable caused by a primarily linear process. The study will investigate which exchange rate regime is best fit and valuable for markets indexes and countries development. This study will therefore attempt to fill this research gap.
Objective of study
The general objectives of the study are to analyze the effect of macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves on exchange rate regimes spanning from 1970 to 2020, identify the significant impacting factor and suggest how to overcome negative impact. Data source by economic surveys, government progress reports, World Bank reports, IMF reports, central banks of countries and governments ministerial and financial websites.
The particular objective is as follows:
Review the trend of countries exchange rate regimes and macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves according to developed, emerging and frontier countries markets index (MSCI rank) for the period of 1970 to 2020.
To analyze the real effects of macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves on exchange rate regimes on the bases of the country by country as well as countries market indexes wise, developed market index, emerging market index and frontier market index countries (MSCI rank) for the period of 1970 to 2020.
What is the trend of exchange rates regimes and macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves in developed, emerging and frontier countries (MSCI rank)?
Does the macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves, have an effect on exchange rate regimes on the bases of the country by country as well as countries market indexes wise, developed market index, emerging market index and frontier market index countries (MSCI rank)?
A brief discussion on the exchange rate
IMF first time devaluation suggests Zambia, since the exchange rate is more practical use in works . An exchange rate is when one country, like Pakistan currency, is exchanged for the other currencies like the British sterling pound and US dollar . There are two types of exchange rate expressions: domestic currency per unit of the foreign currencies, and second the foreign currencies units are expressed as the domestic currency. This study takes data from the currency market, and the exchange rate was defined as the domestic currency per unit of the foreign currencies.
Exchange rate policies
Developing countries central banks of countries like Pakistan bank state of Pakistan determine exchange rate policies since 1990 like exchange rate regime in which Pakistan rupees value vis-à-vis other world currencies is defined in the foreign exchange market as market forces of demand and supply. Demand and supply situation showing the country balance of payment position. Foreign exchange mainly comes from export, foreign direct investment, remittances and foreign loans and demand due to imports, payments of debt. If the order of the foreign currencies was higher than the supply of the foreign money, then domestic currency goes depreciate. As the supply of the foreign currencies is higher than the demand, the domestic currency value increases and vice versa. State bank of Pakistan made sure smooth operation of the foreign exchange market and was needed to intervene in the foreign exchange market. State Bank of Pakistan never predetermines the exchange rate of any currency (SBP). The LDC authorities' exchange rate problem management was varied, and there were issues such as economic stability, promotion of exports, limiting imported inflation and foreign direct investments [26, 27].
Exchange rate regimes
Exchange rate regimes classification (ranked according to the degree of flexibility arrangement basis) has widely literature used: E.R. regimes classified into four categories: (1) floating regimes, (2) intermediate regimes, (3) soft peg regimes and (4) hard peg regimes. Floating regimes subclassified independent (exchange rate determined according to the free market in the demand and supply. Monetary authorities cannot intervene in freely foreign markets and economic policies independently) and light managed floating (the exchange rate determined according to the free market in the demand and supply. Monetary authorities can intervene in free foreign exchange markets and economic policies). Intermediate regimes as managed float (the monetary authorities’ can intervene in the foreign exchange markets without pre-committing or specifying a preannounced way for the exchange rate. Intervention may be direct or indirect as the change in interest rate, unannounced intervene) and crawling board band (the exchange rate adjusted and maintains within broadband around a central rate. Adjusted periodically and preannounced fixed rate (adjusted rule based on differentials between targets)), soft peg regimes described further crawling narrow band (the exchange rate maintained within crawling narrow band around a central rate. Adjusted periodically and preannounced fixed rate (adjusted rule based on differentials between targets)), pegged within bands (the exchange rate allows the fluctuating within a narrow band (around an official or de facto central fixed peg)—may its single currency and cooperative arrangements), (crawling peg (the exchange rate maintained adjustments periodically according to a set of indicators. The exchange rate adjusts preannounced fixed rates), and fixed peg (the exchange rate pegged significant currency with a fixed rate), hard peg regimes described as currency board (the monetary system is based on the fixed-rate legislative commitment to exchange domestic currency for other countries’ currencies) and currency union dollarization like other countries used it as only a legal tender or a Union block by IMF, Frankel and Edwards.
Markets index and MSCI
MSCI is a world-leading service provider of critical decision support tools and global investment. MSCI world markets index ranking is very credible. This study follows the MSCI market index ranking; first, developed markets were ranked as Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan and New Zealand. Emerging markets were China, India, Pakistan, Malaysia, Korea and Indonesia. Third frontier markets rank index according to Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Bahrain, Jordan and Oman.
Exchange rate regimes and developed markets
Developed markets exchange rate regimes were an exciting and timely decision made for the exchange rate that why his regimes very effective and markets growing very fast. Hong Kong was the oldest exchange rate regime from 1841 to February 2, 1895, peg with the silver standard of Mexican piaster's circulate. From February 2, 1895, to December 5, 1935, Hong Kong silver standard dollar was introduced and from December 5, 1935, to 1972, like other world countries peg with UK pound, from January 5, 1942, to September 14, 1946, during pegged with Yen and July 6, 1972, to 2020, peg with US dollar. In January 1900 to 1939, Australian dollar was pegged with gold and partial time by time with the UK pound when the temporary gold standard was suspended. Singapore from February 1906 to June 25, 1972, peg was UK pound, Malaysia and Brunei and on June 25, 1972, to 2020, officially currency was peg change to US dollar: as New Zealand since September 21, 1931, and Australia since August 28, 1939, to December 1971, peg with UK pound with the as active parallel market for US dollar and in December 1971 formally shift and peg with US dollar, Australia, November 1982, New Zealand, March 4, 1985, managed floating; as New Zealand, December 1989, and Australia June 1993, freely floating adopt as targeting inflation framework. Japan currency peg with the UK pound since 1933 to September 1939, and on July 1, 1932, foreign exchange controls were introduced, on December 29, 1941, to August 1945 currency peg with Reich mark. August 1945 to June 1947 black market was skyrocketed. Officially, 15 Yen exchange to a dollar and in the black market, 875 Yen exchange to a dollar on February 1946 with Inflation rate was 513%. From July 1947 to 2020, reference currency was the US dollar with different bands and premiums.
Exchange rate regimes and emerging markets
The exchange rate regimes of Asian countries are significant and impact markets. Malaysia has an emerging market and very effective regimes. From June 25, 1903, to February 1906, currency peg was silver and February 1906 to September 5, 1975, pegged with UK pound. From September 5, 1975, to 2020, currency officially pegged with the US dollar with different bands and premiums. Korea is an industrial hub and emerging market. Since1910 to October 1945, the currency peg was the Japanese Yen (Korean Yen) and from October 1945 to 2020 officially pegged with the US dollar with different bands and premiums. India has a crowded population country and emerging market. From August 1914 to March 22, 1927, currency peg was UK pound, and gold standard peg was March 22, 1927, to September 24, 1931. From September 24, 1931, to September 25, 1975, currency was again pegged with the UK pound. India rupees official peg with US dollar on August 23, 1971, to December 20, 1971, peg was US dollar and again December 20, 1971, to September 25, 1975, pegged with UK pound with as few years active parallel market US dollar. The Indian currency was officially pegged with the US dollar from 1979 to 2020 with different bands and premiums. China has a significant export share in the world economy and its regimes essential roles, especially in Asian markets. From November 3, 1935, to March 14, 1938, currency was pegged with the UK pound and abandoned the silver standard. On March 1, 1938, money was pegged with the Yen. From March 14, 1938, to 1939, dual markets capital controls tightened and was adopted and in 1939 to December 1973 (freely falling/dual market, managed floating/dual market/multiple exchange rates). From January 1974 to till 2020, currency was pegged US dollar with different bands and premiums. Pakistan has a primary emerging market and leading region role player. From the eighteenth century to April 1, 1948, exchange rate was the arrangement with no separate legal tender of the Indian Rupee. It is pegged with British pound/parallel markets from April 1, 1948, to January 15, 1959, and pegged with British pound/parallel markets. Pakistan rupee was introduced in June 1954 with a parallel market premium of 103%. From January 15, 1959, to September 17, 1971, multiple exchange rates/parallel market was adopted, and the rupee was linked with the UK pound. From September 17, 1971, to December 2020, Pakistan rupees officially pegged US dollar/parallel markets with different bands and premiums.
Exchange rate regimes and frontier market index
Bahrain exchange rate arrangement with no separate legal tender from 1862 to 1959 and circulate was Indian and UK pound. From 1959 to January 28, 1966, Persian Gulf rupee was issued and pegged with the UK pound. From January 28, 1966, to June 23, 1972, Bahrain Dinar introduced replaced Gulf rupee and pegged with the UK pound. From June 23, 1972, to December 2020were pegged with the US dollar. Jordan November 1, 1927, to September 21, 1931, pegged with gold and Palestine pound replace with Egyptian piaster. From September 21, 1931, to August 17, 1971, foreign exchange rate control was introduced; the Palestine pound was replaced with Dinar and pegged with the UK pound. From August 17, 1971, to December 2020, Dinar official pegged with US dollar/dual market band. Oman exchange rate was the arrangement with no separate legal tender from the eighteenth century to May 7, 1970. Indian rupees and Maria Therese Thaler and later on Persian Gulf rupee used as exchange. The US dollar and Saudi Rial were pegged from May 7, 1970, to December 2020. Sri Lanka is the neighborhood of India and an important country of Asian regain. From December 16, 1929, to June 1941, pegged Indian rupees under currency board and Indian rupees pegged with UK pound. July 1941 to November 8, 1971, currency pegged was Indian rupees (via UK pound) under currency board and November 8, 1971, to UK pond/dual market, on June 1, 1973, the Ceylon rupee of Sri Lanka rupee and re-pegged with UK pound/dual market. From November 15, 1977, to December 2020 Sri Lanka rupee officially pegged the US dollar with different bands premiums, and the parallel market remains active. Bangladesh has a frontier market and continuously increases the share of world markets. From January 1, 1972, to January 1992, the Bangladesh currency taka was introduced and pegged with the UK pound. From January 11, 1983, to December 2020, de facto crawling peg/dual market/multiple exchange rates pegged with a basket of currencies different bands, premiums and intervention currency mode was US dollar.
Exchange rate and economic growth
Devaluation of the currency was expansionary effects on the country growth economically. Devaluation of the currencies led to cheaper goods and increased demand, as an increase in exports of the countries . An expansionary devaluation effect on country output was evident, devaluation in-country currency improves direct investment, trade balance and balance of payment, expanding output and employment . The exchange rate with economic growth as manufacturing production has positive but not insignificant, which does not support the position that shifting the exchange rate regimes or excessive instability has well-defined effects for manufacturing production. Exchange rate variability in Pakistan has no significant effect on Pakistan manufacturing products . Developing countries like Pakistan have less flexible exchange rates (regimes) and have been associated with very slow growth and with greater output instability. As in the content of industrial countries, regimes have no significant impact on economic growth . GARCH model applied exchange rate instability impact on macroeconomic variables of Pakistan. As exchange rate instability was positive effects on gross domestic product, trade opening and growth rate and negatively affected the FDI . Empirical relations between the exchange rate instability and growth of exports and instability of the exchange rate was significant negative effects short run and long run with most trading countries like USA, UK and European Union . Autoregressive conditional hetero-skedasti city-based measured, exchange rate and nominal were the negative impacts on economic growth as exchange rate instability effect depends on exchange rate regimes and financial trading opening. Instability is more harmful when developing countries adopt flexible exchange rate regimes and financial trading openings . Bound testing approach, augmented dickey fuller (ADF and GARCH), the export of Pakistan, was negatively influenced by exchange rate instability.
On the other hand, prices were massively affected by the country foreign income . The exchange rate was the main role player and affected the macroeconomics performance of the countries. There was a positive relationship between the exchange rate and foreign direct investment . The empirical study has investigated the impact of domestic and foreign currency values, as exchange rate instability affected imports and export demand functions of developing countries. GARCH-based model was used, when Pakistan worked with the US dollar as a medium currency with its trade partners, instability discouraged imports and exports. Exports demand function unaffected by instability distortions. When Pakistan was trading with developing countries, the bilateral exchange rate was valued in domestic currency. When Pakistan was traded with low-income countries, it then performed direct domestic currency .
Exchange rate and inflation
The estimates offered evidence that exchange rate instability persisted and was a negative and significant effect on the economic growth of Nigeria. There was a negative and significant relationship between inflation and the economic growth of Nigeria. Oil prices were useful as the positive and significant relationship among the money supply, government expenditure, financial opening and economic growth of Nigeria . Foreign direct investment was positively linked with currency depreciation, and exchange rate instability deters foreign direct investment. Finance trade opening increases the foreign direct investment, and the basis for inflation was insignificant. Empirical study suggested the exchange rate instability granger causes FDI but not vice versa . The impact of the devaluation of the currency as exchange rate fluctuation was experienced for the next seven years on financial factors like inflation, interest rate and economy . Exchange rate and inflation have a significant but negative impact on developing countries like Pakistan economic growth. GDP decrease will increase inflation as GDP decreases when the exchange rate increase. The result indicates that exchange rate and inflation have a significant impact on the economic . High damage effect to growth during the high inflation crises and most of the countries were recovery trend their precise growth rate . Importantly, countries with similar economies radically choose multi-exchange rate regimes without looking at the substantive cost for macroeconomic indicator outcomes similar to the country’s inflation and growth output (Rose, ).
Exchange rate and foreign direct investment
The exchange rate has mainly affected the macroeconomic performance of world countries. Important study based on secondary data and time-series data of 32 years for the period of 1982 to 2013 examined the impact of exchange rate on foreign direct investment. Correlation and regression analysis techniques adopted through SPSS software and check the relationship among exchange rate and foreign direct investment. Research correlation analysis results showed the exchange rate and foreign direct investment have a positive relationship among others significantly . The exchange rate impact on FDI was two different arguments. The first argument was a direct relationship between foreign direct investment and exchange rate, and in second argument there was a inverse relationship of instability of foreign direct investment and exchange rate. When facing the other side’s the coin, foreign direct investment of the host country can appreciate the exchange rate output or input damping . Currency of Yen appreciation against American and Asian currencies leads to an increase in the foreign direct investment by the manufacturing sector of Japan and other Asian sectors .
Exchange rate and interest rate
Interest rates and inflation have a negative effect on countries economic growth . High exchange rate may cause low investment because the private sector borrows low credit, high risks level, higher interest rate, the demand for collateral by the world financial markets and economic agents to lend to the international and domestic investment due to exchange rate instability which can hinder world economic growth . There is a negative relationship between interest rate and currency ratio. The high interest rate has an impact on the investment and economic growth of countries .
Exchange rate and foreign debt
Empirical studies observed that the level of account of countries foreign debt shows the ability of the country borrows power in its own domestic currency and foreign reserve for the exchange rate system selections. Empirical studies results were not robust in the selection of an exchange rate regime [45,46,47]. The central bank of countries maintains stabilized exchange rate because of most adverse effects of devaluation or depreciation on financial statements, especially when countries going to payable very high debt in foreign currencies . The exchange rate regimes have an important role in determining external debt, debt service burden and sustainability of both. Firstly, direct effects on their size, secondly, effect on growth particularly and competitiveness of developing countries which mostly have a big amount of foreign debt denominate in a foreign currency [49, 50]. Large depreciations direct impact on growth in public sector debt and sustainability of the fiscal positioning. The empirical literature suggested when exchange rate regimes were fixed provided more fiscal control as compared to flexible exchange regimes. Fiscal profligacies were overcome losses in risk of foreign reserves or as well as the build-up of public debt [51, 52].
Exchange rate and import
The researcher adopts the OLS technique to measure the relationship between exchange rate, GDP, inflation rate, import and export of Nigeria. There was a significant positive relationship between the explanatory variable (like exchange rate, import and export) and GDP .
Exchange rate and export
System GMM was used to measure the effect of instability of real exchange rate on export; data were used 106 developed and emerging countries of the world. Investigation reveals the negative relationship between the instability of the real exchange rate with exports . A similar study was conducted, and co-integration and VECM (vector error correction model) used to analyze the data of Pakistan, Sri Lanka and India for the period of 1960 to 2007; the estimation result was showed the significant negative relationship among the instability of real exchange rate to the export of Asian three countries of Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka; and similar result indicated the short run and the long run .
Exchange rate and foreign reserve
Cluster analysis applied on combined data of exchange rates and foreign reserves that why they can count for exchange rate movements as well as exchange market intervention . In spite of the fact that we looked at the exchange rate regimes and economic performance linked with the evolution of exchange rate arrangements, it varies when studied with de facto schemes, and official regimes were not irrelevant even at all times it does not match with de facto regimes. Regimes were very helpful in the financial market's prospect on the development of exchange rate and their effect on global financial policy decisions. Interest rates and changes in gross foreign reserves are used as a proxy for interventions in the exchange rate market which has a drawback. Some countries’ linked the action of central banks foreign reserves with reserve management strategies. Payments of bulky purchases or debt such as imports of oil are not essential to use for exchange rate stabilization motive. Most countries of the world interest rate were put administratively, and result statistics may deviate from the reality of data on the foreign exchange reserves [56, 57].
Data and methodology
Data and sample description
The main objective of this research is to examine the impact of macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves on the exchange rate regimes using the five countries sample from MSCI developed markets index, emerging markets index and frontier markets index each from 1970 to 2020. MSCI is a premier US-based finance firm to provide critical decisions support the tools and services for the global investment society. The core areas of functioning are providing investment data, performance analytics, stock indexes, and portfolio risk and governance tools for investors and funds. MSCI, based on the global investable market index (GIMI) by considering economic, development, size, liquidity and market accessibility framework, designs the developed, emerging and frontier markets indices. These classifications enabled investors to allocate their investments in various risk-returns equity market indices. We choose five countries from each MSCI markets index based on the criteria: (1) countries having complete data of all variables during the sample period, and (2) countries having experience of different exchange rate regimes during the sample period. The data of all macroeconomic variables for each country have been collected from the DataStream of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF).
This study employs the methodology of foreign exchange rate regimes comparable with . exchange rate regimes which were classified into fine and coarse arrangements, but this study only follows the coarse regimes. The coarse regimes arrangements scaled into 1 to 6 based on (1) the separate legal tender, the preannounced peg, the preannounced horizontal band and de facto peg; (2) the preannounced crawling peg, the preannounced crawling band, de facto crawling peg and de facto crawling band; (3) the preannounced crawling band, de facto crawling band, moving band, de facto moving band and managed floating; (4) freely floating; (5) freely falling; and (6) dual markets.
We adopt ML—binary logit (quadratic hill climbing) to investigate the change in the exchange rate is due to change in the macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, interest rates, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, foreign debt and foreign reserves. So the model is shown below with specification.
Wang and Hsiao  and Di Giovanni and Shambaugh  examine the impact variables (1) i is for country and t for time (2) where ex denotes the exchange rate, x is the determinants of impact (Barro ), d is the dummy for the macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves and ε was denoted the zero term.
RGDP = real gross domestic product (growth rate), exchange rate = real effective exchange rate. R = real interest rate, inflation = inflation rate, FDI = foreign direct investment, import = countries import, Export = countries export, foreign reserve: countries foreign reserve.
Variables discussed in the above model are stated of the natural logarithm. The natural logarithm of the variable getting reasons enables to correct skewed data convert into normal distribution which assumption of econometric estimation . As a measurement for the exchange rate, we used multilateral real effective exchange rate regimes rather than bilateral real exchange rates from 1970 to 2020. In real effective of exchange rate regimes on domestic currencies, we are really measuring major trade partners like Asian specified countries according to the ranking of (MSCI indexes) developed market index, emerging market index and frontier market index. We use macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, per capita and interest rate as an annual rate, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, interest rates, foreign debt and foreign reserves as a percentage to GDP and GDP growth as a proxy for the economies.
Stationary unit root tests: Statistical parameters quality of the process mean and standard deviation do not change with the time . Classical regression model assumption (dependent and independent) variables are stationary, and errors have a zero mean and variance in finite terms . T ratio is not useful as T distribution, so it is impossible to validate undertake hypothesis tests about regression parameters . We apply ML—binary logit (quadratic hill climbing) which is used to investigate the change in the exchange rate regimes due to change in the macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, interest rates, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, foreign debt, foreign reserves. In this model, Z value and P value are used to analyze the hypothesis tests about regression parameters.
Results of statistical analysis
Per capita growth
Panel A: Developed markets
Panel B: Emerging markets
Panel C: Frontier markets
Unit root test
The statistical results of the macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, interest rates, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, foreign debt and foreign reserves of developed, emerging and frontier markets in the table, indeed reflect the above scenario of stationary and long-run relationships between variables as expected; significant levels of *, **, ***showing each critical value of Mackinnon 1%, 5% and 10% of ADF and P.P. test are based on intercept, without() showing level and with () are showing the first difference.
Develop markets and regression
− 9.20*** (− 4.462)
− 4.993*** (− 4.308)
− 1.381** (− 1.974)
0.0008 (− 0.2184)
− 0.146*** (− 4.5526)
− 0.0.35*** (− 3.4448)
− 0.07*** (− 4.3064)
− 1.393** (− 9953)
− 0.164** (− 2.4836)
− 0.254*** (− 3.2793)
− 0.138*** (− 3.5482)
− 0.0564*** (− 2.6011)
− 0.2557 (− 0.4483)
− 0.0502 (− 1.0561)
− 0.3315*** (− 5.5185)
− 0.509** (− 2.4079)
− 0.3893 (− 0.6661)
− 0.4120* (− 1.9404)
− 0.101** (− 2.1188)
− 0.797*** (− 3.8789)
− 0.1670 (− 1.5483)
− 0.19*** (− 2.7036)
− 1.72*** (− 3.9101)
− 0.8124 (− 0.6460)
− 0.0091 (− 0.0160)
− 0.1068 (− 0.3868)
− 0.1666 (− 0.3922)
− 0.5178** − 2.1952
− 0.687*** (− 3.4331)
S.D. dependent ver
Akaike info criterion
H. Quinn criter
The statistical results of the ML—binary logit (quadratic hill climbing) for developed markets exchange rate regime one the above table reflect the scenario and coefficient results as estimation; its foreign debt, GDP, foreign reserve serve as the highest positively significant and GDP per capita as the highest negatively significant for long-run impacts variable on developed markets during exchange rate regimes 1 while imports stand negatively second and inflation positively is third significant important variable as exchange rate country regimes. Results showing exchange rate of developed markets countries highly depend on foreign debt expected to impact the foreign reserve and country growth. The estimate of long-run coefficients of the binary logit for the exchange rate regime two is presented in table; the imports serve as the highest positively significant, and exports and interest rate serve as the highest negatively significant for long-run impacts variable on the developed market from exchange rate regimes while foreign direct investment stands second positively as GDP and inflation negatively significant. GDP per capita positively is third, debt and foreign reserve less important significant variable as compared to import, export, inflation of developed markets from exchange rate regimes two time period. According to results of the binary logit of exchange rate regime three, the exports serve as the high negatively significant for long-run impacting variable on developed markets from exchange rate regimes while debt and inflation stand second place of positively significantly important for developed markets. Imports, GDP and interest rate serve as positively, and foreign direct investment, GDP per capita and foreign reserve are serve as negatively significant less important as compared to export, debt and inflation for developed markets in exchange rate regimes three time period. Exchange rate regime four shows the foreign direct investment serves as the highest positively significant, and imports, foreign debts and inflation serve as the highest negatively significant for long-run impacts variable on the developed market from exchange rate regimes while foreign reserve stands second positively and interest rate is negatively significantly important for developed markets during exchange rate regimes four time period. Exports are serve as positively and GDP, GDP per capita significant level at low means its less impact of exchange rate regime during exchange rate regime four time period. Exchange rate regime five table results show the exports positively and imports serve as the highest negatively significant impacting variables. Foreign reserves second important variable is positively significant and impact the exchange rate regimes in five time periods where GDP, foreign debt, interest rate and foreign reserve as positively and foreign direct investment, inflation, GDP per capita as negatively significant impact during the exchange rate regimes five time period. Exchange rate regime six results showing the exports, per capita positively and foreign debt, imports, foreign direct investment foreign reserve stand-level one highest significant most impacting variables during exchange rate regimes six time period. GDP negatively impacts significant second and inflation, interest rate placed third significant important variable for developed markets during exchange rate regimes six time period.
Emerging markets and regression
− 3.0114*** (− 4.8160)
− 6.5213*** (1.5877)
− 0.0041 (− 0.6183)
− 0.0017 (− 0.0642)
− 0.2242*** (0.0493)
− 0.1581*** (− 4.6264)
− 0.1028 (− 0.9634)
− 0.0895 (− 0.1644)
− 1.2457*** (− 5.2158)
− 0.0115 (− 0.5589)
− 0.1740*** (0.0659)
− 0.4267* (− 1.8825)
− 1.8932*** (0.4422)
− 0.1042*** − 3.79120
Mc Fadden R-squared
S.D. dependent var
Akaike info. Criterion
N (total observations)
The statistical results of the ML—binary logit (quadratic hill climbing) for emerging markets exchange rate regimes on the above table reflect the scenario and coefficient results as estimation; its exports, foreign direct investment, GDP per capita serve as the highest positively significant and GDP, imports, foreign reserves serve as the highest negatively significant for long-run impacts variable on emerging markets during exchange rate regimes one time period. While interest rate stands positively significant important at second level and foreign debt, inflation serves negatively significant impacting variable on emerging markets during exchange rate regimes for the time period. Exchange rate regimes two foreign reserve is positively significant, and GDP per capita is most negatively significant impacting variable in emerging markets. GDP, foreign debt, imports, inflation, interest rate are second important positive significant variables as exports foreign direct investment are negatively significant variables in emerging markets during the exchange rate regime two time period. Exchange rate regimes five GDP and imports are highly positively significant impacting variables, while exports, interest rate and GDP per capita are the most negatively significant variables in emerging markets during exchange rate regimes five time period. Foreign debt that serves positively second and foreign reserve which serve positively third significant leave importance in emerging markets as inflation serves as positively and foreign direct investment negatively less important significant level as compared to other variables of emerging markets during exchange rate regimes five time period. Just for surprising results during the analysis of the emerging markets data, emerging markets were not followed by the exchange rate regimes 3, 4, 6 till 2020, which may leading impact factor of developed and emerging markets.
Frontier markets and regression
− 9.1446 (− 1.4618)
− 5.3882*** (− 3.9538)
− 0.0437*** (− 4.3023)
− 0.3539 (− 1.1822)
− 0.0459 (− 1.4115)
− 0.0070 (− 0.2002)
− 0.1216 (− 1.2355)
− 0.0808 (− 0.3214)
− 0.0735 (− 0.6662)
− 0.2021 (− 2.5531)
− 0.1311 (− 0.2171)
− 0.0668 (− 0.9143)
− 0.0240 (− 0.3820)
− 0.0960 (− 0.7347)
− 0.1450*** (− 3.2670)
Mc Fadden R-squared
S.D. dependent var
Akaike info. criterion
N (total observations)
The statistical results of the ML—binary logit (quadratic hill climbing) for frontier markets exchange rate regimes one inflation has positively significant at the highest level and foreign debt; the foreign reserve has negatively highest significant major impacting variables in frontier marks during exchange rate regimes one time period while GDP, exports, foreign direct investment, interest rate are positively significant and imports and GDP per capita have a negatively significant impact on frontier markets during exchange rate regimes one time period. Exchange rate regimes two foreign debt, imports, foreign direct investment inflation and foreign reserve have positively significant and most impacting variables in frontier markets when frontier countries apply the exchange rate regimes two during the time period while GDP, exports, interest rate and GDP per capita have negatively significant impacts on frontier markets during exchange rate regimes two time periods. Exchange rate regimes five as results showing of frontier markets foreign debt on top is highly positive significant important variable and foreign reserves as second most useable and positively significant variable in frontier markets during exchange rate regimes five time period. Imports and GDP per capita positively and exports, foreign direct investment, GDP, inflation, interest rate have negative impact significant variables in frontier markets during exchange rate regimes five time period. As a result, frontier markets similar to emerging markets do not follow the exchange rate regimes of three, four, and six from 1970 to 2020, which is a real impacting and leading factor of emerging and frontier markets.
Discuss the conclusion, implications and policy recommendations of the findings in context of existing research
This study examines the impact of macroeconomic variables, i.e., GDP growth, GDP per capita, interest rates, inflation, foreign direct investment, exports, imports, foreign debt and foreign reserves on the exchange rate regimes used the sample of five countries from MSCI developed markets index, emerging markets index and frontier markets index each from 1970 to 2020. The methodology and data used in the study are robust and most reliable. For the statistical consideration, the study explores the modern technology and methods to investigate the issues in contents of the exchange rate regimes of developed, emerging and frontier markets from microeconomic variables. The study investigates the microeconomic variable impacts on the six levels of exchange rate regimes. The statistical results of the ML—binary logit (quadratic hill climbing) are very interesting and valuable. Surprisingly results show emerging and frontier markets countries that did not follow the exchange rate regimes level three, four and six as followed by developed markets countries from 1970 to 2020, which is leading impact factors that affect the markets of emerging and frontier countries. Countries markets that get timely exchange rate regimes decisions that boost their markets now its develop markets; those markets (emerging and frontier market) do not follow exchange rate regimes as develop markets causes of straggling markets. Developed markets and foreign debt in exchange rate regimes one were positively and four and six for negatively very impacting variable, which shows develops markets impressive growth during foreign debt increase and decline when foreign debt decrease. Exports of developed countries grow in exchange rate regimes level two negatively and level five and six positively, which mean exports increase during the described period. Imports of developed countries grow high point in exchange rate regimes level two negatively and in level four, five, and six positively. Foreign direct investment more favorable time of growth in developed markets exchange rate regimes level four is positively, and six are for negatively effecting markets sentiments. For GDP, more preferable is exchange rate regimes level one, which highly impact developed markets. Inflation raises highly in developed markets during exchange rate regime four, which is favorable for market growth but affects people's purchasing power in developed countries. As a result of interest rate is most effacing time is exchange rate regimes two when high-interest rate negatively impacts on developed markets, during high-interest rate markets growth slowdown. In developed markets, personal income (GDP per capita) is the highest negative in exchange rate regimes level two and highest positive during level six. Foreign reserves grow in exchange rate regimes level one highest positive and level six highest negative impact on developed markets. According to emerging markets, mostly positive variables like exports, foreign direct investment, GDP per capita, while GDP, import, foreign reserves tech highest negative and highly affect the markets during exchange rate regimes one time period. Exchange rate regimes level two are not favorable for emerging markets. Exchange rate regimes level five highly positively affecting variables of imports, GDP and exports, interest rate and GDP per capita negative affecting emerging markets. For Frontier markets, exchange rate regimes level two is not favorable as microeconomic indicators like emerging markets. Inflation was highly positive, and foreign debt foreign reserves were highly negative during exchange rate regimes level one and most affecting the frontier markets. Foreign debt and foreign reserve growth in exchange rate regimes level five highest positive impacting on frontier markets. For frontier markets, major variables are inflation, foreign debt and foreign reserve, which affect people of frontier markets and countries markets growth. Inflation raises, which is favorable for market growth but affects people's purchasing power. When countries borrow foreign debt and foreign reserves, markets have a reasonable fund that attracts the local and foreign investors, leading to the impressive growth of markets.
The study is never limited, giving new opportunities and ideas to explore the research. First, this study used annual data to analyze the different variables with different periods because of mostly data availability as an annual form. The size of the sample may be extendable. Suppose data are available in the form of quarterly, monthly bases, which conclude more conclusive results. May others appropriate and related variables included in the model like the public and private investment, saving on REER, foreign trade and equity. Secondly, time-series data are collected invaluable and different ways; data are appropriate sources like World Bank, IMF and central banks sites, but every date its update and changes acquired, data collected by according (MSCI index rank) 15 countries due to different base years which may calculate affect value. Finally, this study analyzed the base of course line regimes. It is the more comprehensive view and may more conclusive results on the base of regimes lines (15), which conclude separate currency arrangements. Moreover, some studies indicate the time-series data macroeconomic variable used as the nonlinear relationship may affect. This study assumes and examines the variable linearly because of the 51 years of data available.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Fentahun B (2011) The impact of a real effective exchange rate on the economic growth of Ethiopia. M.sc thesis, Addis Ababa University
Aguirre A, Calderon C (2005) Real exchange rate misalignments and economic performance. Central Bank of Chile, 1–49. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1160654
Levy-Yeyati E, Sturzenegger F (2005) Classifying exchange rate regimes: Deeds vs. words. Eur Econ Rev 49(6):1603–1635
Parveen S, Khan AQ, Ismail M (2012) Analysis of the factors affecting exchange rate. Acad Res Int 2(3):670–674
Yasmin B, Rauf H (2004) Measuring the underground economy and its impact on the economy of Pakistan. Lahore J Econ 9(2):93–103. https://doi.org/10.35536/lje.2004.v9.i2.a5
Hameed I, Soomro YA, Shakoor R (2012) A devaluation is a Devastating Act for a Third World Country: a case study of Pakistan economy. Am J Sci Res 63:5–13
Guitian M (1976) The effects of changes in the exchange rate on output, prices and the balance of payments. J Int Econ 6(1):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(76)90023-4
Easterly W, Loayza N, Montiel P (1997) Has Latin America’s post-reform growth been disappointing? J Int Econ 43(3–4):287–311
Couharde C, Sallenave A (2013) How do currency misalignments’ thresholds affect economic growth? J Macroecon 36:106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.11.002
Kiani M, Ahmed A, Zaman K (2015) Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches for measuring the underground economy of Pakistan. Qual Quant 49(1):295–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9987-1
Ahmad A, Ahmad N, Ali S (2013) Exchange rate and economic growth in Pakistan (1975–2011). J Basic Appl Sci Res 3(8):740–746
Bruno M (1994) Michael Bruno and William Easterly. IMF Staff Papers, 202
Chughtai MW, Waqas Malik M, Aftab R (2015) Impact of major economic variables on economic growth of Pakistan. Acta Univ Danub 11(2):94–106
Bleaney M, Greenaway D (2001) The impact of terms of trade and real exchange rate instability on investment and growth in sub-Saharan Africa. J Dev Econ 65(2):491–500
Khan Z, Ali A, Ali S (2016) Impact of Devaluation on balance of trade: a case study of Pakistan economy. Asian J Econ Model 4(2):90–94. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.8/2016.4.2/22.214.171.124
Saharuddin D, Rama A (2017) Currency system and its impact on economic stability. Al-Iqtishad J Islam Econ. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v9i2.4749
Obuobi B, Nketiah E, Awuah F, Agyeman FO, Ofosu D, Adu-Gyamfi G, Adjei M, Amadi AG (2020) Impact of currency redenomination on an economy: an evidence of Ghana. Int Bus Res 13(2):62. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v13n2p62
Salih Memon M, Bux Soomro R, Hussain Mirani S, Ahmed Soomro M (2020) Exchange rate fluctuations & economy of Pakistan, time-series analysis (1989–2013). REICE Rev Electrón de Investig En Ciencias Econ 8(16):474–489. https://doi.org/10.5377/reice.v8i16.10710
Jamil MN (2021) Monetary policy stability under control of exchange rate and consumer price index. J Environ Sci Econ 1(1):35–44
Jamil MN et al (2022) Corporate social responsibility impacts sustainable organizational growth (firm performance): an empirical analysis of Pakistan stock exchange-listed firms. J Environ Sci Econ 1(2):34–40
Hasanov FJ et al (2022) Money demand under a fixed exchange rate regime: the case of Saudi Arabia. J Appl Econ 25(1):385–411
Kurita T, James P (2022) The Canadian–US dollar exchange rate over the four decades of the post‐Bretton Woods float: an econometric study allowing for structural
Jamil MN (2022) Impact the choice of exchange rate regime on country economic growth: which anchor currency leading the 21st century. J Environ Sci Econ 1(1):18–27
Iliyasu J, Sanusi AR (2023) The role of announced exchange rate policies on exchange rate pass-through to consumer prices in an oil-based small open economy. SN Bus Econ 3(1):1–20
Applegate MJ (1990) A nonlinear multi-sectoral simulation analysis of devaluation and import substitution in Zambia. J Dev Areas 24(4):543–556
Gylfason T (1986) Does Devaluation Make Sense? Reprint Series No. 320. Sweden: Institute for International Economic Studies, University of Stockholm
Gylfason T (1987) Does Exchange Rate Policy Matter? Reprint Series No. 341. Sweden: Institute for International Economic Studies, University of Stockholm
Salvatore D (2005) The Euro-dollar rate defies prediction African. J Policy Model 27(4):455–464
Acar M (2000) Devaluation in developing countries: expansionary or contractionary? J Econ Soc Res 2(1):59–83
Azid T, Jamil M, Kousar A (2005) Impact of exchange rate instability on growth and economic performance: a case study of Pakistan, 1973–2003. Pak Dev Rev 44(4 PART II):749–772. https://doi.org/10.30541/v44i4iipp.749-775
Levy-Yeyati E, Sturzenegger F (2003) To float or to fix: evidence on the impact of exchange rate regimes on growth. Am Econ Rev 93(4):1173–1193
Mahmood I, Ehsan Ullah M, Ahmed H (2011) Exchange rate instability & macroeconomic variables in Pakistan © society for business and management dynamics © Society for business and management dynamics. Bus Manag Dyn 1(2):11–22
Mustafa K, Nishat M (2004) Instability of exchange rate and export growth in Pakistan: the structure and interdependence in regional markets. Pak Dev Rev 43(4 II):813–825. https://doi.org/10.30541/v43i4iipp.813-828
Barguellil A et al (2018) Exchange rate instability and economic growth. J Econ Integr 33(2):1302–1336
Aftab M, Abbas Z, Kayani FN (2012) Impact of exchange rate instability on sectoral exports of Pakistan: an ARDL investigation. J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud 5(3):215–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/17544401211263973
Bilawal M, Ibrahim M, Abbas A, Shuaib M, Ahmed M (2013) Impact of exchange rate on foreign private investment in Pakistan. Econ Knowl 5(4):9–16. https://doi.org/10.13189/aeb.2014.020602
Khan AJ, Azim P, Haider Syed S (2014) The impact of exchange rate instability on trade: a panel study on Pakistan’s trading partners. Lahore J Econ 19(1):31–66. https://doi.org/10.35536/lje.2014.v19.i1.a2
Adeniran JO, Yusuf SA, Adeyemi OA (2014) The impact of exchange rate fluctuation on the Nigerian economic growth: an empirical investigation. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 4(8):45–68. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v4-i8/1091
Ullah S, Haider SZ, Azim P (2012) Impact of exchange rate instability on foreign direct investment a case study of Pakistan. Pak Econ Soc Rev 50(2):121–138
Rose AK (2011) Era : fixed, floating, and flaky. July 1997, 652–672
Sattar R, Rehman H (2012) Effectiveness of exchange rate in Pakistan. Pak J Comer Soc Sci 6:83–96
Baek I-M, Okawa T (2001) Foreign exchange rates and Japanese foreign direct investment in Asia. J Econ Bus 53:69–84
Eriṣ MN, Ulasan B (2013) Trade openness and economic growth: Bayesian model averaging estimate of cross-country growth regressions. Econ Model 33:867–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.05.014
Yasmin B, Rauf H (n.d.) Measuring the Underground Economy and its Impact on the Economy of Pakistan Bushra Yasmin and Hira Rauf. 93–103
Benigno P, Missale A (2004) High public debt in currency crises: fundamentals versus signalling effects. J Int Money Finance 23:165–188
John G, Mauro P (2002) Long-run determinants of exchange rate regimes: a simple sensitivity analysis. Working Paper 02/104, International Monetary Fund
Velasco A (1996) Fixed exchange rates: credibility, flexibility and multiplicity. Eur Econ Rev 40:1023–1035
Calvo G, Reinhart C (2000) Fixing for your life. Working Paper 8006, National Bureau of Economic Research
Calvo G, Izquierdo A, Talvi E (2003) Sudden stops, the real exchange rate and fiscal sustainability: Argentina’s lessons. Working Paper 9828, National Bureau of Economic Research
Tornell A, Velasco A (1994) Fiscal policy and the choice of exchange rate regime. Working Paper 303, Inter-American Development Bank
Tanzi V (1977) Inflation lags in the collection and the real value of tax revenue. IMF Staff Paper 24(1):154–167
Nashashibi K, Bazzoni S (1993) Alternative exchange rate strategies and fiscal performance in Sub-Saharan Africa. Working Paper WP/93/68, International Monetary Fund
Apollo’s EA, Emmanuel A, Olusegun DJ (2015) Exchange rate instability and economic growth in Nigeria (1986–2013). J Empir Econ 4(2):109–115
Vieira FV, MacDonald R (2016) Exchange rate instability and exports: a panel data analysis. J Econ Stud 43(2):203–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-05-2014-0083
Mukhtar T, Malik SJ (2010) Exchange rate instability and export growth: evidence from selected South Asian countries. SPOUDAI J Econ Bus 60(3–4):58–68
Ghosh AR, Gulde A-M, Wolf HC (2002) Exchange rate regimes: choices and consequences. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Bubula A, Otker-Rober I (2002) The evolution of exchange rate regimes since 1990: evidence from de fact policies. Working Paper WP/02/155, International Monetary Fund
Ilzetzki E, Kenneth SR (2019) Updated February 4, 2019, The country chronologies and background material to exchange rate arrangements into the 21st century : will the anchor currency hold ? Ethan Ilzetzki London School of Economics Carmen M. Reinhart Harvard University Kenneth S. Rogoff. (2019). 1–132
Wang S, Hsiao C (2005) Should China let her exchange rate float? The experience of developing countries. Asia-Pac J Account Econ 12(1):1–17
Di Giovanni J, Shambaugh JC (2008) The impact of foreign interest rates on the economy: The role of the exchange rate regime. J Int Econ 74(2):341–361
Barro R (1991) Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quart J Econ 106:407–443
Verbeek M (2008) A guide to modern econometrics. John Wiley & Sons.
Challis RE, Kitney RI (1991) Bio-medical Signal Processing. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 28(6)
Granger C, New bold P (1974) Spurious regression in econometrics. J Econom, 2
Bowerman BL, O’Connell RT (1979) Time series and forecasting. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Massachusetts
I profoundly thanks to almighty Allah who blessed me with willpower, determination and passion to complete this research work. I also owe my thanks to the greatest leader and teacher of all mankind “Prophet Muhammad (SAW),” who taught us to pursue the quest for knowledge. I salute my family for their immense care, love and believe in me. I am grateful to my parents, brother, sisters, my colleagues, nephews and nieces who always give confidence and support to complete this task.
The authors declare that no funds, grants or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent to participate
All authors have given their consent to participate in submitting this manuscript to this journal.
Consent for publication
The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jamil, M.N., Rasheed, A., Maqbool, A. et al. Cross-cultural study the macro variables and its impact on exchange rate regimes. Futur Bus J 9, 9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00189-1
- Exchange rate regimes
- Macroeconomic variables
- MSCI markets index