Skip to main content

The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: new insights from Ghana

Abstract

A way of reducing global warming and tackling Ghana’s energy sector crisis, known as Dumsor, is through renewable energy usage. Nevertheless, the advancement of the renewable energy industry is contingent on economic growth, the availability of financial resources, and energy prices. The paper explores the long-run impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption while controlling for energy prices and economic growth. Consistent with the aim of the paper, the ARDL bounds testing, Bayer-Hank, Gregory and Hansen cointegration, VECM, FMOLS, CCR and DOLS tests are employed. The empirical analysis supports cointegration between variables. Moreover, the findings indicated that financial development drives renewable energy use in Ghana, whereas energy costs and economic growth have a negative effect. This study offers a substantial addition to renewable energy literature and paves the way for policymakers to pursue alternative energy sources to help satiate the nation’s growing energy needs.

Introduction

There has been extensive scholarly interest in the link between renewable energy consumption (henceforth: REC) and its drivers during the past few decades, perhaps due to growing knowledge of greenhouse gas emissions and their detrimental environmental implications. However, energy is critical for developing and advanced economies to attain sustainable development. Population growth, improved standard of living, production enhancements, and economic competition have resulted in a substantial increase in energy usage over the last decade [1]. However, according to [2], the proportion of fossil fuels to total energy is very high; although renewable energy demand grew by approximately 5% each year from 2009 to 2019, the share of fossil fuels remained at approximately 80% of total energy usage over the same period. Excessive fossil fuel combustion results in large carbon dioxide (CO2) releases into the atmosphere, leading to adverse environmental impacts such as climate change [3]. Since it threatens the natural equilibrium of life, the greenhouse effect is one of the most pressing issues of our era [4]. One option for preventing global warming and its dire consequences on the environment involves minimizing the use of fossil fuels in power generation and transitioning to renewable energy sources that do not generate greenhouse gases. In addition to reducing environmental externalities, renewable energy may safeguard economies that rely heavily on energy imports against exogenous shocks [5, 6]. Although the link between energy demand and economic growth has gotten much attention in energy-growth literature, it is still unclear how these variables influence one another due to differences in econometric methods, the measure of financial development investigated, the nation and the period under consideration.

The start-up costs and operating expenditures of renewable energy projects are more than those of fossil fuels [7,8,9]. Mukhtarov et al. [9] and Best [10] suggested that an advanced financial sector can accelerate renewable energy sector development by efficiently channelling funds towards the sector. To buttress this, Kim and Park [11] pointed out that renewable energy projects highly dependent on equity and debt financing advance quicker in economies with developed financial sectors than in underdeveloped ones because institutional and equity financing are more appropriate for capital-intensive investments [12]. Since Ghana embarked on the Financial Sector Adjustment Program (FINSAP) in 1988, financial liberalisation in 1990, the implementation of the universal banking system in the first quarter of 2003, and the financial sector clean-up, which reduced the number of universal banks from 30 at the start of 2018 to 23, the country’s financial sector is still intensifying reforms and liberalisation. Thus, its influence on the energy industry is in a continuous state of flux. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the relationship between REC and financial development (henceforth: FD), specifically how FD impacts REC.

Against this backdrop, this study empirically examines how financial development impacts renewable energy consumption. For this purpose, various econometrics techniques were utilised for Ghana. Ghana is a developing country with a population above 32 million. As the population continues to increase, the energy demand also increases. However, Ghana imports a more significant share of its energy needs. Due to this occurrence, Ghana continues to maintain a negative current account (% GDP), which increased from −2.73% in 2019 to −3.04% in 2020, mainly driven by sluggish oil production, cocoa production, and higher energy imports. The link between financial development and renewable energy usage has been studied in a number of countries, which are covered in subsequent sections. The current paper deviates from previous studies in various ways. First, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is perhaps the first study to explore the nexus between financial sector development and renewable energy usage in Ghana at the individual country level. Kwakwa [13] is the only study that attempted to link renewable energy usage to financial development in Ghana. He investigates the factors influencing renewable energy use in Ghana. From the outcomes of the ARDL and FMOLS models, he established that financial development has a deleterious effect on renewable energy usage. The current study focuses on the impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption over a relatively long period. In Addition, we attempt to fill this gap by proposing a model to investigate the impact of financial development, economic growth and energy prices on renewable energy usage in the case of Ghana, employing the ARDL, Gregory and Hansen cointegration, VECM, Bayer and Hanck cointegration, fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS), canonical cointegrating regression (CCR) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) techniques.

In lieu of relying on conventional measures of financial development, our study utilizes a comparatively new and detailed financial development index created by Svirydzenka [14]. This index measures the overall financial development capturing the development of both financial institutions and financial markets. We enrich the extant literature by examining the theoretical link between financial development and renewable energy in Ghana. In addition, the empirical findings derived by analysing the link between financial development, economic growth, energy prices, and renewable energy consumption can aid policymakers in Ghana in formulating policies to achieve the goal of renewable energy consumption; this is the pragmatic contribution of the paper. This paper’s findings demonstrate that financial sector development in Ghana predominantly promotes renewable energy usage. However, renewable energy investments are influenced by numerous factors. Therefore, policymakers face a colossal task in formulating particular responses to this circumstance. In this context, one of the paper’s contributions is to suggest what should be prioritized to accomplish this objective.

The following structure applies to the remaining sections: Sect. 2 offers an overview of the renewable energy profile of Ghana and relevant literature on the subject; Sect. 3 describes the method and data sources; the fourth section contains the results of the analyses and the discussion. Finally, the conclusion, which includes an overview of the results and policy ramifications, is discussed in the last part.

Ghana renewable energy profile and related literature review

Ghana renewable energy profile

Ghana is an energy-importing and energy-exporting country with an energy dependency problem. Ghana imports a substantial portion of its energy requirements from countries such as La Cote D’Ivoire and other parts of the world while exporting power to Togo, Benin and Burkina Faso. Ghana’s primary energy sources are hydro, thermal and solar. However, a significant portion of energy requirements is met by fossil fuels. Ghana has abundant renewable energy resources that have yet to be completely tapped. These comprise bioenergy, hydropower, wind and solar energy. In 2011, the Renewable Energy Act (832) was enacted to transform these renewable potentials into actual energy by fostering an environment conducive to attracting private investment in the renewable energy sector.

Figure 1 depicts the trend of REC (% of total energy usage) on a downward spiral. In 1990 the proportion of renewable energy in the total energy consumed was approximately 80%, which declined to approximately 42% in 2019. This raises the question of why REC (% of total energy consumption) declines despite growing income levels and the financial sector deepening. Is it that the increasing income levels and deepening of the financial sector are not promoting the generation and use of renewable energy in Ghana, or are some other variables accounting for this? These are the questions the paper attempts to find solutions to. Ghana is currently at the centre of urbanisation in West Africa, notably in education, technology, and the economy. Additionally, industrialization has contributed to an increase in energy consumption. This has compelled the government to pursue alternate renewable energy sources to supplement the predominant hydroelectric energy supply, such as the Akosombo Dam on the River Volta. However, the electricity producing company, Volta River Authority (VRA), cannot meet users’ demands. Therefore, the nation has been obliged to practice electricity rationing, sometimes known as “Dumsor,” over the past decade. Therefore, Ghana must increase its renewable energy production not just to fulfil the energy needs of its citizens but also to take the lead in lowering CO2 emissions and combating climate change [15]. In light of these energy problems concerning economic growth, it is crucial and feasible for Ghana to implement steps to deepen, diversify, and seek cheap alternative energy sources to enhance the energy supply to meet demand.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A plot of renewable energy consumption and financial development in Ghana (1990–2019)

Relevant literature review

Literature on energy usage and economic growth has received significant interest in the past decades, albeit conflicting findings. The findings are focused on four key hypotheses. One is the conservative hypothesis provided by the pioneering study of Kraft and Kraft [16], which opines that there is unidirectional causation from growth to energy usage, e.g., [9, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Consequently, as economies expand, the demand for energy to support greater quality of life will also increase. On the other hand, some studies have also claimed that energy is a crucial aspect of industrialisation, contributing to economic expansion [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. These studies lend credence to the growth hypothesis. Some studies also found a two-way (bidirectional) causality between growth and renewable energy usage [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. These studies’ findings are in sync with the feedback hypothesis, which incorporates the conservative and growth hypotheses. It postulates that a stable energy supply promotes economic growth, which drives the demand for energy consumption. Finally, other studies have validated the neutrality hypothesis, which asserts no causality between economic growth and renewable energy usage [45,46,47,48,49,50,51].

Recent years have witnessed the emergence of the finance-energy nexus as one of the most pressing matters in economics and finance. Consuming fossil fuels is known to increase the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide [52], while it is acknowledged that using renewable energy decreases carbon dioxide emissions [53,54,55,56,57]. For example, some studies found that financial development drives energy demand [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]. Other studies, however, demonstrated a detrimental impact of FD on REC [22, 71,72,73]. However, a study by Denisova [63] demonstrated that FD does not affect REC. Other studies also argued that the FD-energy nexus is nonlinear; thus, they tested for asymmetric effects and nonlinearities in the link (see [23, 74,75,76,77,78], among others).

The study’s primary purpose is to investigate the impact of financial development on adopting renewable energy, which is a fascinating field of study. Renewable energy projects demand high initial outlays and extended payback periods [52, 79, 80]. This circumstance is a crucial obstacle to improving these projects [9]. Recent research on the FD-REC nexus has shown that advancements in financial intermediation operations drive down the costs of renewable energy investments and stimulate the usage of renewable energy [81,82,83]. Market-based financial development also promotes productivity by channelling capital towards green energy projects, stimulating the demand for green energy [11, 58, 59, 84, 85]. To buttress this, Brunnschweiler [86] argued that advanced financial systems could efficiently channel investments toward the green energy sector, while weak financial systems may inhibit the flow of capital toward the green energy sector. Therefore, participants in the renewable energy sector would favour nations with a developed financial system due to the high likelihood of obtaining access to funding quickly [87, 88].

Additionally, McFarlane et al. [74] emphasized that progress in the financial sector improves financial intermediation, making it easier for businesses and households to take loans (as well as increasing investment opportunities). This allows individuals to spend more money on luxury products and increase the demand for energy, largely when the goods in question are automobiles and machines [88]. However, until now, studies on the exact impact of FD on REC are limited. Babbar and Schuster [89] uncovered significant knowledge gaps in funding renewable energy projects and emphasized the need for private participation in developing nations.

Regarding 34 developing nations, Shahbaz et al. [52] assessed the effect of FD on REC from 1994 to 2015. The empirical evidence indicates that FD drives REC, whereas economic growth negatively impacts REC. Regarding the effect of energy prices on REC, the study found that it had no effect. Consequently, they asserted that REC would lower carbon dioxide emissions compared to fossil fuels. To fulfil sustainable development objectives, the government should thus introduce incentives and tax policies encouraging companies’ demand for renewable energy use. Mukhtarov et al. [9], utilising the VECM and ARDL techniques, studied the effect of FD on REC in Turkey from 1980 to 2019. They discovered that FD has a beneficial influence on the REC. In addition, the study indicates that economic growth favourably influences REC. However, their analyses demonstrated that price increases harm renewable energy consumption.

Khan et al. [90] applied a panel quantile regression technique for a worldwide panel of 192 nations from 1980 to 2018. The heterogeneity of REC, FD, and CO2 emission was investigated. They discovered that REC dampens CO2, but FD affected REC favourably. Employing annual data from the top 15 REC countries and a panel smooth transition model (PSTR), Raza et al. [77] found that a high (low) FD regime has a positive (dampening) effect on REC. In the case of India, Eren et al. [1] investigated the relationships between FD, economic growth, and REC. Their dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) estimate results indicate that FD has a beneficial effect on REC. Concerning causation, they supported the feedback hypothesis and one-way causality from FD to economic growth and REC without feedback.

Anton and Nucu [91] based their study on the fixed effect model for a panel of 28 European Union (EU) nations from 1990 to 2015. Their findings show that FD generally has a positive effect on REC. However, the data indicate that the expansion of financial markets has little impact on REC in new EU member nations. Kim and Park [11] found that in countries with robust financial markets, renewable energy sectors more reliant on debt and equity funding expand rapidly. Using a panel of 20 emerging nations covering 1991–2012, Paramati et al. [85] concluded that stock mark development, foreign direct investment and growth positively affect REC. The findings lend credence to Wu and Broadstock [92], who found that FD positively influenced REC for 22 emerging economies from 1990 to 2010. Using the ARDL-PMG model, Wang et al. [6] showed that economic growth stimulates REC while FD harms it for both China and western China. Ali et al. [93] confirmed the feedback loop between FD and REC variables. Rasoulinezhad and Saboori [94] found a one-way causality from FD to REC. Hassine and Harrathi [27] investigated the FD-REC nexus for the Gulf Cooperation Council nations from 1980 to 2012. They established a unidirectional causality emanating from the REC to FD. The study further showed that the long-run coefficients from REC to FD are positive and significant.

The FD-REC nexus for each nation or regional bloc is a priori uncertain, based on the review of relevant literature. Therefore, the link must be empirically determined. Unfortunately, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, empirical research has not yet explored the nexus between Ghana’s financial sector development and renewable energy usage. Second, most studies concentrated on a particular indicator and renewable energy proxy. Nonetheless, additional variables may have a substantial influence on these projects. Hence, a study that evaluates how several variables affect REC concurrently is necessary to comprehend crucial challenges for enhancing renewable energy investments. In this context, we examine how financial development, economic growth and energy prices impact renewable energy usage. Third, we observed that existing studies on the FD-REC nexus have largely employed numerous quantity-based indicators of FD, such as domestic credit (% GDP), total value of stocks traded (% GDP), liquid liabilities (% GDP) and stock market turnover (% GDP) (e.g., [6, 9, 13, 65, 92, 95, 96]). Nevertheless, financial development is a multifaceted dimension; thus, measuring it with any of the enumerated variables might result in excluding other crucial dimensions. To address this problem, this study’s measure of FD is predicated on a comparatively recent and in-depth index constructed by Svirydzenka [14]. Analysing this comprehensive dimension within the REC framework will yield results that might pave the way for future investigations seeking to influence renewable energy and financial development policy. Despite all this empirical evidence, financial sector reforms, and developments in the renewable energy sector in Ghana, one needs to be reminded by Kwakwa [13] that there is little unanimity on how FD relates to REC.

Given that renewable energy is much more expensive than conventional energy sources [97], improved access to financial resources is essential for its advancement. That is to say, the development of the financial sector may facilitate investments in renewable and clean energy sources. Therefore, it is anticipated that there is a favourable relationship between FD and REC. Drawing on recent studies, the following hypotheses are examined:

H1o

Financial development is not positively related to renewable energy consumption in Ghana. Hence, increases in financial development do not promote renewable energy consumption in the long-run.

H1a

Financial development is positively related to renewable energy consumption in Ghana. Hence, increases in financial development promote renewable energy consumption in the long-run.

H2o

There is no cointegration between financial development and renewable energy consumption in Ghana. Hence, there is no long-run association between the two variables.

H2a

There is cointegration between financial development and renewable energy consumption in Ghana. Hence, there is a long-run association between the two variables.

Methods

Several authors [23, 52, 65, 78, 98] modelled energy consumption as a function of financial deepening, energy cost and economic growth. Using the same conceptual model, McFarlane et al. [74], Mukhtarov et al. [9], Shahbaz et al. [52], and Mukhtarov et al. [66] developed a model in which REC is a function of financial development, real GDP per capita and consumer price index. This model was further extended by Anton and Afloarei Nucu [91] by including foreign direct investment (FDI). However, some studies [23, 59, 99] utilised FDI to measure financial development. Considering these studies, we failed to capture FDI as a separate term in our model specification. Therefore, in sync with previous studies, we specify the model as follows:

$${lnREC}_{t}={\alpha }_{0}+{\alpha }_{1}{lnFD}_{t}+{\alpha }_{2}{lnEG}_{t}+ {\alpha }_{3}{lnCPI}_{t}+ {\varepsilon }_{t}$$
(1)

In Model 1, \({REC}_{t}\) represent renewable energy consumption; \({FD}_{t}\) denotes financial development; \({EG}_{t}\) denotes economic growth; and \({CPI}_{t}\) represents energy prices. \({\varepsilon }_{t}\) is the stochastic error term. Level or log forms of data can be used to estimate Model 1. A priori FD (\({\alpha }_{1}\)) and EG (\({\alpha }_{2}\)) are expected to increase ( +) REC, while CPI (\({\alpha }_{3}\)) is expected to drag (−) REC.

This study examines the impact of FD on REC while controlling for EG and CPI in Ghana. Given the data availability, the sample period spans from 1990 to 2019. The following data: renewable energy consumption (% of total energy consumption), economic growth (EG) measured by real GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$) and energy prices (CPI) measured by Consumer price index (2010 = 100) utilised in this study were all gleaned from World Development Indicators (WDI) [100]. However, due to the unavailability of data on energy prices for all nations, CPI, which has been used extensively to measure energy prices in earlier studies [9, 23, 59, 66, 74, 101, 102], was employed in this study. For our analysis, FD is measured by a financial development index introduced by Svirydzenka [14], which encompasses the overall depth, accessibility and efficiency of financial institutions and markets. They have since been updated and are available in the IMFs [103] financial development index database. Table 1 provides a brief descriptive analysis of the variables before their natural logarithm transformation. REC ranges from 41.480 to 82.928% of total energy consumed, FD ranges from 0.082 to 0.153, EG ranges from 891.305 to 2053.587, and CPI ranges from 1.881 to 278.452. The Jarque–Bera test demonstrates that all variables have a normal distribution, as shown by the corresponding p-value. Figure 2 depicts graphical representations of the variables.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics.
Fig. 2
figure 2

Source: WDI and IMF Database

A plot of variables used in the study.

We convert all variables to their natural algorithmic form for estimation and interpretation of results purposes. In this study, we evaluate the long-run impact of FD on REC while controlling for changes in EG and CPI using the ARDL bound test cointegration technique. This technique was chosen above conventional cointegration approaches because it yields accurate and reliable results for small and finite sample data. It is suitable when dealing with a mixture of I(0) and I(1) variables. Furthermore, the ARDL utilise dynamic specifications, which account for the effect of the lagged values of the outcome and the explanatory variables. Additionally, this flexible specification technique permits a simultaneous estimate of the long- and short-run associations. The paper employs the Zivot-Andrews [104] unit root test to explore the unit root characteristics and structural break(s) presence in the series. Traditional unit roots testing approaches such as Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Phillips and Perron (PP) are unsuitable and may yield biased results in the presence of structural break(s) in the data [95, 105]. The ARDL technique necessitates the series is at most I(1). After estimating the ARDL model, we do the bounds test. The estimation of the ARDL model is given by Model 2:

$${\Delta lnREC}_{t}=\,{\Phi }_{0}+{\Phi }_{1}{lnREC}_{t-1}+{\Phi }_{2}{lnFD}_{t-1}+{\Phi }_{3}{lnEG}_{t-1}+{\Phi }_{4}{lnCPI}_{t-1}+\sum_{i=1}^{n}{\varkappa }_{i}{\Delta lnREC}_{t-1}+\sum_{i=1}^{n}{\beta }_{i}{\Delta lnFD}_{t-1}+ \sum_{i=1}^{n}{\sigma }_{i}{\Delta lnEG}_{t-1}+\sum_{i=1}^{n}{\psi }_{i}{\Delta lnCPI}_{t-1}+{\varepsilon }_{t}$$
(2)

For the ARDL model, the variables have already been specified, n signifies the maximum lag length, and ln denotes the variables converted into natural logs. The first component of model 2, with \({\Phi }_{1}\),\({\Phi }_{2},\) \({\Phi }_{3}\) and \({\Phi }_{4}\) represents the long-run parameters, and the second component with \(\varkappa ,\) \(\beta\), \(\sigma\) and \(\psi\) indicates the short-run parameters. The null hypothesis is that cointegration does not exist H0:\({\Phi }_{1}\)= \({\Phi }_{2}=\) \({\Phi }_{3}\)=\({\Phi }_{4}\)  = 0 and the alternate hypothesis H1: \({\Phi }_{1}\)\({\Phi }_{2}\ne\) \({\Phi }_{3}\ne {\Phi }_{4}\)≠ 0 suggests cointegration among the series. The bounds test consists of the F-bounds test and the t-bounds test. The F- and t-statistic for the model are calculated using the parameter estimates given in Model 2, which are then compared to their corresponding I(0) and I(1) values at the selected significance level. The null hypothesis associated with each test is rejected if their estimated values exceed their corresponding I(1) values at the acceptable significance level. Then the analysis leads to the conclusion that the variables are cointegrated. The maximum lag (n) was determined using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) so that the estimated model’s residuals are free from serial correlation, heteroscedasticity, or non-normality. In addition, to check the stability of Model 2, we employ the cumulative sum (CUSUM) of recursive residuals and the cumulative sum (CUSUM) of recursive residuals. Lastly, we undertake the Ramsey RESET test to ensure the absence of any functional form misspecification in the ARDL model. If the model is stated accurately, no nonlinear function of the explanatory variables should be a significant predictor of the outcome variable.

However, if the time series variable includes unidentified structural breaks due to economic crises, exogenous shocks, policy shifts, or technological shocks, using conventional cointegration techniques to the residuals of regression will result in specification errors [106]. Gregory and Hansen [106] presented a cointegration test to account for the potential of regime shifts resulting from a single endogenous structural break. Therefore, to explore the robustness of ARDL cointegration outcomes in the existence of structural breaks, the regime-switching cointegration test proposed by Gregory and Hansen [106] and the combined cointegration test suggested by Bayer and Hanck [107] were implemented since all the series are I(1). The Bayer and Hanck [107] cointegration test focus on reducing superfluous multiple-test approaches to provide accurate estimates. After confirming cointegration among the variables, we use the ARDL model to evaluate their long-run relationships. To check the fortitude of the ARDL long-run estimates, the VECM, fully modified OLS (FMOLS) proposed by Phillips and Hansen [108], the canonical cointegrating regression (CCR) and dynamic OLS techniques developed by Stock and Watson [109] were utilized. FMOLS, DOLS, and CCR enable asymptotic coherence to be established by taking serial correlation into account.

The paper only estimates the long-run parameters of model 2. The estimation approaches employed in this study have been extensively utilised in comparable studies. In addition, several previous studies have provided detailed information [106, 107, 110,111,112,113,114], among others.

Results and discussion

Before testing for cointegration, we explored the order of integration of variables to confirm that none of the variables utilised in this paper is I(2). This is because the ARDL bound testing technique is inappropriate when variables I(2) are included. In addition, the Bayer-Hanck and Gregory and Hansen cointegration conditions demand that all variables be I(1). We explore the unit root characteristics and the presence of structural breaks in the variables using the Zivot and Andrews [104] unit root test. The outcome of the unit root tests is reported in Table 2. The results suggest that none of the variables is stationary at level. After taking the first difference, however, all variables were stationary, with structural breaks for lnREC, lnFD, lnEG, and lnCPI in 2014, 2011,2014, and 2000, respectively. Consequently, the ARDL, Gregory and Hansen, and Bayer and Hanck cointegration procedures are applicable.

Table 2 Zivot-Andrews unit root test outcomes.

After determining via the Zivot and Andrews unit root tests that all the variables are I(1), the cointegration bound test grounded on the well-specified ARDL model is next conducted. To apply the ARDL bounds test method, the appropriate lag length must first be identified. Therefore, using a randomly selected lag length, we specify a VAR model where all the variables of interest are endogenous. Finally, the lag order selection criteria test was executed on the residuals to determine the optimum lag interval for the cointegration bounds test. Table 3 displays the results of the lag interval estimations. In this study, all the VAR lag order selection criterion confirms that a lag order of one is optimum.

Table 3 Lag selection test.

The VAR has worthwhile qualities, according to the diagnostics tests reported in Table 4. The residuals of the estimated VAR do not exhibit heteroscedasticity, serial correlation and are normally distributed. The model is also stable, no root lies outside the unit circle.

Table 4 Diagnostics results for the VAR model.

The cointegration association between the variables was evaluated using the ARDL bounds test for cointegration. Table 5 summarizes the findings of the cointegration analysis. The relationship represents REC as a function of REC, EG, FD and CPI. We demonstrate that the F-test statistic for Model 2 surpasses the I(1) value at the 1% significance level (7.92 against 5.61). The F-test indicates that we cannot accept the null hypothesis. The t-test result supports this since the estimated value in absolute terms surpasses the I(1) value at the 1% significance level (-5.10 against -4.37). Therefore, we deduce that the variables have a cointegrating relationship.

Table 5 ARDL bounds test.

The Bayer-Hanck [107]combined cointegration, which estimated Fisher statistics for EG-JOH and EG-JOH-BO-BDM and the Gregory and Hansen [106] cointegration tests results are presented in Table 6. At a 5% significance level, the results of both tests suggest that the variables are cointegrated, indicating a long-run association among the variables.

Table 6 Cointegration tests outcomes.

Given the cointegration between the outcome variable and the regressors, we estimate the long-run relationship between the variables using the ARDL technique. Then, we performed model diagnostics check using the residuals of the estimated ARDL model. We can conclude from Table 8 that the ARDL model is statistically appropriate. First, we fail to reject the null hypothesis for Breusch-Godfrey serial correlation LM Test, Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey heteroskedasticity test and Jarque–Bera normality test since their associated p-values are greater than the 10% significance threshold. Moreover, neither the t-statistic nor the F-statistic of the Ramsey RESET test is significant, indicating that the model is devoid of any functional form misspecification. Finally, as shown in Figs. 3 and 4, the CUSUM and CUSUM of squares are within their respective 5% confidence intervals, indicating no evidence of model instability at the 5% confidence level or below.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Plot of the cumulative sum of recursive residual

Fig. 4
figure 4

Source: The author

A plot of the cumulative sum of squares of recursive residuals.

Finally, we employ the VECM, FMOLS, DOLS and CCR techniques to ascertain the ARDL model’s robustness. The VECM residuals were also analysed, and Table 7 demonstrates that all the results met the acceptance criteria. As depicted in the Table, there are no problems of serial correlation, heteroscedasticity or non-normality.

Table 7 ARDL, VECM, DOLS, FMOLS and CCR long-run estimates.

The long-run estimates of these five methods are significant and comparable in sign and magnitude. The outcomes of the long-run estimates reveal that, at a significance level of 5%, a rise in FD increases REC. From Table 7, a 1% rise in FD leads to 0.237, 0.534, 0.276%. 0.178% and 0.195% rise in REC as indicated by the ARDL, VECM, DOLS, FMOLS and CCR long-run estimators, accordingly. Our results accord with economic theory, Mukhtarov et al. [9] for Turkey and Shahbaz et al. [52] for 34 developing economies but contradicts the findings of Kwakwa [13]. They have empirically shown that FD has a deleterious impact on REC in Ghana. The discrepancies in findings may be attributable to the measures of FD and sample period. Our outcome is based on a more accurate measure of FD and a larger sample size. From a theoretical viewpoint, the beneficial impact of FD on REC suggests that advanced financial systems enable institutions and individuals to easily access inexpensive sources of funds to expand or start their businesses or acquire luxury items, increasing the demand for renewable energy.

In contrast, the results show that at the 1% significance level, EG has a deleterious effect on REC. The implication is that holding other variables constant, a 1% expansion in the economy will lead to a 0.642% decline in REC. A plausible explanation is that as Ghana’s per capita income increased between 1990 and 2019, REC decreased due to inadequate income levels, and consumer spending drifted to fossil fuels. The empirical analysis confirms the findings of Shahbaz et al. [52] for developing countries but contradicts the findings of Mukhtarov et al. [9] for Turkey and McFarlane et al. [74] for Jamaica which established that economic growth drives REC. We also established an inverse association between REC and CPI, which is significant at the 1% level. This finding concurs with economic theory and empirical findings of Mukhtarov et al. [9] and McFarlane et al. [74]. However, this empirical evidence differs from Shahbaz et al. [52], who confirmed the neutral effect of energy prices on REC.

Additionally, the model’s error correction term was estimated. The error correction term generated by the ARDL bounds testing approach was negative and significant at the 1% level, in accordance with theory. The implication is that there is a mean-reverting process at work and that, following a shock, the system’s disequilibrium tends to be corrected toward the long-run path (see Table 8).

Table 8 Diagnostic results for the ARDL model.

Conclusions and policy implications

Despite its economic and environmental downsides, the use of fossil fuels as energy sources is nevertheless widespread. Due to global environmental deterioration and macroeconomic issues, policymakers and scholars are interested in renewable energy resources and their usage. As renewable energy sources become prevalent worldwide, we investigate the dynamic relationship between financial deepening and renewable energy usage. To the authors’ knowledge, the impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption while controlling for income levels and energy prices has not been explored comprehensively using newly developed econometric approaches in the case of Ghana. Using the ARDL, Bayer and Hanck, Gregory and Hansen cointegration, VECM, FMOLS, DOLS, and CCR tests, this paper attempts to address this lacuna in the literature on renewable energy. Our major discoveries are twofold. First, the outcome of the ARDL, Bayer and Hanck, Gregory and Hansen cointegration tests suggest a long-run linkage between renewable energy usage and its potential drivers (namely FD, EG and CPI). Second, the outcome of the ARDL, VECM, DOLS, FMOLS and CCR long-run estimators suggest that increasing levels of FD promote REC. However, increasing energy prices and economic growth negatively influence renewable energy usage.

The study has both practical and societal ramifications. The practical ramifications are the deepening of the financial sector, which is Ghana’s dominating strategy for sustainability and energy-related policymaking. Consequently, the beneficial causal effect of FD on REC implies that increasing cost of borrowing, higher financial risk, high cost of capital, lessening information transparency, and difficult access to funds are likely to have a deleterious impact on REC, thereby harming the environment. Concerning the social ramifications of our findings, we claim that a higher level of financial development in climate financing will positively affect society. Therefore, financial institutions should support environmental sustainability by providing affordable loans for developing the renewable energy sector. This would help Ghana achieve its sustainable development objectives and reduce its reliance on fossil fuels.

Furthermore, Ghana has embraced the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of the United Nations; Goal 7 of the Sustainable Development Goals is to ensure universal access to affordable, reliable, and reliable power services. However, this objective poses a difficult hurdle for Ghana because of its heavy reliance on non-renewable energy sources, despite the vast untapped potential for renewable energy. Therefore, it is suggested that policymakers establish the required stimulus and tax regulations to promote the demand for renewable resources among financial sector organizations. Furthermore, governments might give green energy investors interest-free financing facilities regarding incentives. Moreover, renewable energy investments are exempt from taxation. These factors have a favourable effect on cost reduction, enhancing the projects’ efficiency. A major limitation of this paper is that the analyses conducted are at an aggregate level. To the author’s best knowledge, the association between these variables have not been studied at the disaggregated level for the case of Ghana. Such an investigation is one direction for future study. Another avenue for future investigation could be to explore the asymmetric impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption in Ghana and other parts of the world.

Availability of data and materials

In this investigation, we exclusively used secondary data sources. In this study, no new data is used or produced.

Abbreviations

REC:

Renewable energy consumption

FD :

Financial development

VECM:

Vector error correction model

ARDL:

Autoregressive distributed lag

FMOLS:

Fully modified ordinary least squares

DOLS:

Dynamic ordinary least square

CCR:

Canonical cointegrating regression

References

  1. Eren BM, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) The impact of financial development and economic growth on renewable energy consumption: empirical analysis of India. Sci Total Environ 663:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. REN21 (2021) Renewables 2021 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat

  3. Du L, Dinçer H, Ersin İ, Yüksel S (2020) IT2 fuzzy-based multidimensional evaluation of coal energy for sustainable economic development. Energies (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tebaldi C, Ranasinghe R, Vousdoukas M, Rasmussen DJ, Vega-Westhoff B, Kirezci E, Kopp RE, Sriver R, Mentaschi L (2021) Extreme Sea levels at different global warming levels. Nat Clim Chang 11:746–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang B, Wang Q, Wei YM, Li ZP (2018) Role of renewable energy in China’s energy security and climate change mitigation: an index decomposition analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 90:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Zhang S, Zhang Q (2021) The relationship of renewable energy consumption to financial development and economic growth in China. Renew Energy 170:897–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bamati N, Raoofi A (2020) Development level and the impact of technological factor on renewable energy production. Renew Energy 151:946–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin B, Zhu J (2019) Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint. J Environ Manage 247:662–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mukhtarov S, Yüksel S, Dinçer H (2022) The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: evidence from Turkey. Renew Energy 187:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Best R (2017) Switching towards coal or renewable energy? The effects of financial capital on energy transitions. Energy Econ 63:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim J, Park K (2016) Financial development and deployment of renewable energy technologies. Energy Econ 59:238–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang D, Cao H, Zou P (2016) Exuberance in China’s renewable energy investment: rationality, capital structure and implications with firm level evidence. Energy Policy 95:468–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwakwa PA (2021) What determines renewable energy consumption? Startling evidence from Ghana. Int J Energy Sect Manage 15:101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Svirydzenka K (2016) Introducing a New Broad-based Index of Financial Development. IMF Working Papers 16:1

  15. Kuamoah C (2020) Renewable energy deployment in Ghana: the hype, hope and reality. Insight Afr 12:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kraft J, Kraft A (1978) On the relationship between energy and GNP. The J Energy Dev 3:401–403

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alshehry AS, Belloumi M (2015) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: the case of Saudi Arabia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Faisal F, Tursoy T, Ercantan O (2017) The relationship between energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from non-Granger causality test. Proc Comput Sci 120:671–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Twerefou DK, Iddrisu KS, Twum EA (2018) Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from the West African sub region. West Afr J Appl Ecol 26:217–233

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sadorsky P (2009) Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy 37:4021–4028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. da Silva PP, Cerqueira PA, Ogbe W (2018) Determinants of renewable energy growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from panel ARDL. Energy 156:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Islam F, Shahbaz M, Ahmed AU, Alam MM (2013) Financial development and energy consumption nexus in Malaysia: a multivariate time series analysis. Econ Model 30:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang SC (2015) Effects of financial developments and income on energy consumption. Int Rev Econ Financ 35:28–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burakov D, Freidin M (2017) Financial development, economic growth and renewable energy consumption in Russia: a vector error correction approach. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  25. Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Can H, Korkmaz Ö (2019) The relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth: the case of Bulgaria. Int J Energy Sect Manage 13:573–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ben HM, Harrathi N (2017) The causal links between economic growth, renewable energy, financial development and foreign trade in gulf cooperation council countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7:76–85

    Google Scholar 

  28. Khobai H, Le RP (2018) Does renewable energy consumption drive economic growth: evidence from granger-causality technique. Int J Energy Econ Policy 8:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hamit-Haggar M (2016) Clean energy-growth nexus in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel with structural breaks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:1237–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhattacharya M, Paramati SR, Ozturk I, Bhattacharya S (2016) The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: evidence from top 38 countries. Appl Energy 162:733–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kahia M, Ben AMS, Lanouar C (2017) Renewable and non-renewable energy use - economic growth nexus: the case of MENA Net Oil Importing Countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dees P, Vidican Auktor G (2018) Renewable energy and economic growth in the MENA region: empirical evidence and policy implications. Middle East Dev J 10:225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tang CF, Tan BW, Ozturk I (2016) Energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1506–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Paramati SR, Mo D, Gupta R (2017) The effects of stock market growth and renewable energy use on CO2 emissions: evidence from G20 countries. Energy Econ 66:360–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Amri F (2016) The relationship amongst energy consumption, foreign direct investment and output in developed and developing Countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64:694–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saidi K, Ben Mbarek M (2016) Nuclear energy, renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth for nine developed countries: evidence from panel Granger causality tests. Prog Nucl Energy 88:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kahia M, Ben Aïssa MS, Charfeddine L (2016) Impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth: new evidence from the MENA Net Oil Exporting Countries (NOECs). Energy 116:102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin B, Moubarak M (2014) Renewable energy consumption - economic growth nexus for China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sebri M, Ben-Salha O (2014) On the causal dynamics between economic growth, renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and trade openness: fresh evidence from BRICS countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Al-Mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JYM (2014) Electricity consumption from renewable and non-renewable sources and economic growth: evidence from Latin American countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 30:290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Apergis N, Payne JE (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Econ 34:733–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cherni A, Essaber Jouini S (2017) An ARDL approach to the CO2 emissions, renewable energy and economic growth nexus: Tunisian evidence. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:29056–29066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang S, Li Q, Fang C, Zhou C (2016) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 542:360–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu Y, Hao Y (2018) The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic development in the countries along “the Belt and Road.” Sci Total Environ 645:674–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bélaïd F, Youssef M (2017) Environmental degradation, renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth: assessing the evidence from Algeria. Energy Policy 102:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S (2015) Output, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and international trade: evidence from a panel of 69 countries. Renew Energy 83:799–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Menegaki AN (2011) Growth and renewable energy in Europe: a random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis. Energy Econ 33:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Destek MA (2016) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth in newly industrialized countries: evidence from asymmetric causality test. Renew Energy 95:478–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rafiq S, Salim RA (2009) Temporal causality between energy consumption and income in six Asian emerging countries. Appl Econ Q 55:335–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:3220–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yu ESH, Jin JC (1992) Cointegration tests of energy consumption, income, and employment. Resour Energy 14:259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shahbaz M, Topcu BA, Sarıgül SS, Vo XV (2021) The effect of financial development on renewable energy demand: the case of developing countries. Renew Energy 178:1370–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ahmed K, Long W (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve and Pakistan: an empirical analysis. Procedia Econ Finance 1:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:838–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mert M, Bölük G (2016) Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:21669–21681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:1074–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pata UK, Yurtkuran S (2018) The effect of renewable energy consumption, population density and financial development on C02 emissions: the case of Turkey. Int J Econ Admin Stud 303–318

  58. Sadorsky P (2011) Financial development and energy consumption in Central and Eastern European frontier economies. Energy Policy 39:999–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sadorsky P (2010) The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 38:2528–2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Aslan A, Apergis N, Topcu M (2014) Banking development and energy consumption: evidence from a panel of Middle Eastern countries. Energy 72:427–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lebe F, Akbas YE (2015) Effect of industrialization, financial development, economic growth and urbanization on energy consumption in Turkey: an evidence with multiple structural breaks. EGE Acad Rev 15(2):197–206

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ma X, Fu Q (2020) The influence of financial development on energy consumption: worldwide evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Denisova V (2020) Financial development and energy consumption: evidence from Germany. Int J Energy Econ Policy 10:35–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yang L, Hui P, Yasmeen R, Ullah S, Hafeez M (2020) Energy consumption and financial development indicators nexuses in Asian economies: a dynamic seemingly unrelated regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:16472–16483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Mukhtarov S, Humbatova S, Seyfullayev I, Kalbiyev Y (2020) The effect of financial development on energy consumption in the case of Kazakhstan. J Appl Econ 23:75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mukhtarov S, Mikayilov JI, Mammadov J, Mammadov E (2018) The impact of financial development on energy consumption: evidence from an oil-rich economy. Energies (Basel) 11:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  67. Odusanya IA, Osisanwo BG, Tijani JO (2016) Financial development and energy consumption nexus in Nigeria. Œconomica 12:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  68. Komal R, Abbas F (2015) Linking financial development, economic growth and energy consumption in Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Shahbaz M, Khan S, Tahir MI (2013) The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Econ 40:8–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kakar ZK (2016) Financial development and energy consumption: evidence from Pakistan and Malaysia. Energy Sour Part B 11:868–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Ansu-Mensah P, Kwakwa PA (2021) Modelling electricity consumption in Ghana: the role of financial development indicators. Green Finance 4:54–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Sadorsky P (2016) The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: implications for sustainable development. Energy Econ 55:52–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Farhani S, Solarin SA (2017) Financial development and energy demand in the United States: new evidence from combined cointegration and asymmetric causality tests. Energy 134:1029–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. McFarlane A, Brown L, Campbell K, Das A (2022) Is the impact of financial development on energy consumption in Jamaica asymmetric? Int J Energy Sect Manage. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-02-2022-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Sare YA (2019) Effect of financial sector development on energy consumption in Africa: Is it threshold specific? Int J Green Energy 16:1637–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Shahbaz M, van Hoang TH, Mahalik MK, Roubaud D (2017) Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in india: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Econ 63:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Raza SA, Shah N, Qureshi MA, Qaiser S, Ali R, Ahmed F (2020) Non-linear threshold effect of financial development on renewable energy consumption: evidence from panel smooth transition regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:32034–32047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Gaies B, Kaabia O, Ayadi R, Guesmi K, Abid I (2019) Financial development and energy consumption: Is the MENA region different? Energy Policy 135:111000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Karltorp K (2016) Challenges in mobilising financial resources for renewable energy - the cases of biomass gasification and offshore wind power. Environ Innov Soc Transit 19:96–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. D’Orazio P, Löwenstein P (2022) Mobilising investments in renewable energy in Germany: Which role for public investment banks? J Sustain Finance Invest 12:451–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Claessens S, Feijen E (2006) Financial sector development and the millennium development goals. World Bank Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.950269

  82. Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37:246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Tamazian A, Bhaskara Rao B (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Minier J (2009) Opening a stock exchange. J Dev Econ 90:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Paramati SR, Ummalla M, Apergis N (2016) The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies. Energy Econ 56:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Brunnschweiler CN (2010) Finance for renewable energy: an empirical analysis of developing and transition economies. Environ Dev Econ 15:241–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Usman M, Makhdum MSA (2021) What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development. Renew Energy 179:12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Ehigiamusoe KU, Guptan V, Narayanan S (2021) Rethinking the impact of GDP on financial development: evidence from heterogeneous panels. Afr Dev Rev 33:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Babbar S, Schuster J (1998) Power project finance : experience in developing countries. The World Bank

  90. Khan H, Khan I, Binh TT (2020) The heterogeneity of renewable energy consumption, carbon emission and financial development in the globe: a panel quantile regression approach. Energy Rep 6:859–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Anton SG, Nucu AEA (2020) The effect of financial development on renewable energy consumption. A panel data approach. Renew Energy 147:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Wu L, Broadstock DC (2015) Does economic, financial and institutional development matter for renewable energy consumption? Evidence from emerging economies. Int J Econ Policy Emerg Econ 8:20–39

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ali Q, Khan MTI, Khan MNI (2018) Dynamics between financial development, tourism, sanitation, renewable energy, trade and total reserves in 19 Asia cooperation dialogue members. J Clean Prod 179:114–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Rasoulinezhad E, Saboori B (2018) Panel estimation for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, CO2 emissions, the composite trade intensity, and financial openness of the commonwealth of independent states. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:17354–17370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Abokyi E, Appiah-Konadu P, Abokyi F, Oteng-Abayie EF (2019) Industrial growth and emissions of CO2 in Ghana: the role of financial development and fossil fuel consumption. Energy Rep 5:1339–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Zeraibi A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Murshed M (2021) The influences of renewable electricity generation, technological innovation, financial development, and economic growth on ecological footprints in ASEAN-5 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:51003–51021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Sisodia GS, Soares I, Ferreira P (2016) The effect of sample size on European Union’s renewable energy investment drivers. Appl Econ 48:5129–5137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Ali HS, Hook LS, Bin YZ (2015) Financial development and energy consumption nexus in Nigeria: an application of autoregressive distributed lag bound testing approach. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5:816–821

    Google Scholar 

  99. Mielnik O, Goldemberg J (2002) Foreign direct investment and decoupling between energy and gross domestic product in developing countries. Energy Policy 30:87–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. World Bank (2022) World Development Indicators | DataBank. In: World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators. Accessed 12 Jul 2022

  101. Komal R, Abbas F (2015) Linking financial development, economic growth and energy consumption in Linking financial development, economic growth and energy consumption in Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Mahadevan R, Asafu-Adjaye J (2007) Energy consumption, economic growth and prices: a reassessment using panel VECM for developed and developing countries. Energy Policy 35:2481–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. International Monetary Fund (2022) International Monetary Fund. In: Financial Development Index Database. https://data.imf.org/?sk=f8032e80-b36c-43b1-ac26-493c5b1cd33b&sId=1480712464593. Accessed 12 Jul 2022

  104. Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10:251–270

    Google Scholar 

  105. Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS (2021) Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence. Sustain Dev 29:583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996) Practitioners corner: tests for cointegration in models with regime and trend shifts. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 58:555–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Bayer C, Hanck C (2013) Combining non-cointegration tests. J Time Ser Anal 34:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Phillips PCB, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes. Rev Econ Stud 57:99–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61:783–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Pesaran MH, Shin Y (1999) An Autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strøm S (ed) Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge University Press, pp 371–413

  111. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49:1057–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level of relationships. J Appl Economet 326:289–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Phillips P, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KBP developed the original draft, wrote all the sections, and collected and analysed the data. Also, the author has thoroughly read and approved the manuscript. KBP read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ Information

Kwadwo Boateng Prempeh (PhD) is a Senior Lecturer in Finance at the Department of Accountancy of the Sunyani Technical University, Sunyani. He holds degrees from Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (PhD and MBA in Business Management (Finance)) and the University of Education (BEd Mathematics). He has several years of experience in teaching and learning in higher education. Also, he has taught various undergraduate and post-graduate courses. His research interest includes but is not limited to financial sector development, financial inclusion, stock market volatility and financial innovation. He has authored and co-authored many impactful scientific articles published in reputable journals and serves as a Reviewer for various reputable journals. Dr. Prempeh has served on several committees and boards and is currently the Head of the Department of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Faculty of Business and Management Studies. In addition, he currently serves as a moderator and external examiner for other Universities.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwadwo Boateng Prempeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The author declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prempeh, K.B. The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: new insights from Ghana. Futur Bus J 9, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00183-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00183-7

Keywords