Skip to main content

Table 3 Structural relationships and hypothesis testing

From: Brand authenticity influence on young adults’ luxury sneakers brand preference: the mediating role of brand image

Hypothesis

Path

t-statistics

Path coefficient

p-value

Results

H1

Originality → Brand Image

4.594

0.470

0.000

Supported and significant

H2

Genuineness → Brand Image

2.124

0.212

0.034

Supported and significant

H3

Continuity → Brand Image

0.629

-0.073

0.530

Supported and not significant

H4

Perceived Value → Brand Image

1.997

0.150

0.046

Supported and significant

H5

Logo → Brand Image

0.579

-0.029

0.563

Supported and not significant

H6

Integrity → Brand Image

0.130

0.010

0.897

Supported and not significant

H7

Brand Signature → Brand Image

2.949

0.205

0.003

Supported and significant

H8

Brand Heritage → Brand Image

1.101

0.079

0.270

Supported and not significant

H9

Brand Image → Brand Preference

31.244

0.869

0.000

Supported and significant

  1. Source: Field data (2021)