Skip to main content

Table 5 Board gender diversity and accrual earnings management

From: The impact of board gender diversity on the accrual/real earnings management practice: evidence from an emerging market

Variables

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Modified Jones

Kothari model

Kasznik model

Raman and Shahrur model

L.AEM

0.061***

0.027***

0.067***

0.032***

(0.002)

(0.001)

(0.002)

(0.002)

BRDDIV

0.064***

− 0.037***

− 0.033***

− 0.020*

(0.014)

(0.010)

(0.008)

(0.010)

ROA

− 0.005

0.116***

− 0.143***

0.056

(0.043)

(0.037)

(0.038)

(0.057)

ROE

− 0.017

− 0.034

0.075***

− 0.054

(0.024)

(0.022)

(0.014)

(0.034)

LIQ

0.001*

− 0.002

0.000

− 0.003***

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

LEV

− 0.062***

− 0.025***

− 0.035***

− 0.042***

(0.015)

(0.009)

(0.013)

(0.011)

GEAR

0.019***

0.012***

0.009*

0.008*

(0.003)

(0.004)

(0.005)

(0.004)

FIRMSIZER

0.015***

0.020***

− 0.015***

0.020***

(0.005)

(0.004)

(0.004)

(0.005)

ASSTAN

0.054***

0.003

0.017***

0.003

(0.009)

(0.006)

(0.006)

(0.007)

OC

− 0.013***

− 0.022***

0.015***

− 0.019***

(0.004)

(0.004)

(0.003)

(0.005)

EMFLEX

0.070***

0.006

− 0.007

− 0.002

(0.007)

(0.008)

(0.007)

(0.013)

Constant

− 0.069***

0.007

0.002

− 0.007

(0.017)

(0.014)

(0.008)

(0.018)

Observations

936

936

936

936

Number of firms

78

78

78

78

Number of instruments

78

77

78

76

AR (1) test (p value)

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

AR (2) test (p value)

0.402

0.971

0.248

0.470

Hansen test (p value)

0.323

0.416

0.401

0.357

  1. This table presents the results from System-GMM estimations for dynamic panel-data models. The dependent variable is the AEM proxies. Sample consists of 1014 observations during period 2009–2021. Two-step results and Hansen J tests never reject the validity of the over-identifying restrictions. Second-order autocorrelation AR (2) of residuals is always rejected. Standard errors are reported in parentheses. *, **, *** significance levels at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively