Table 3 Descriptive Statistics for Tax risks’ variables
ID | Statements | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | strongly agree | Mean | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Freq | % | Freq | % | Freq | % | Freq | % | |||
Q.9 | An ontology-based knowledge management can reduce Transactional risk | 0 | 0 | 14 | 16.7 | 26 | 31 | 44 | 52.4 | 4.3571 |
Q.10 | An ontology-based knowledge management can reduce Operational risk | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14.3 | 25 | 29.8 | 47 | 56 | 4.4167 |
Q.11 | An ontology-based knowledge management can reduce Compliance risk | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14.3 | 25 | 29.8 | 47 | 56 | 4.4167 |
Q.12 | An ontology-based knowledge management can reduce Financial accounting risk | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14.3 | 25 | 29.8 | 47 | 56 | 4.4167 |
Q.13 | An ontology-based knowledge management can reduce Portfolio risk | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14.3 | 19 | 22.6 | 53 | 63.1 | 4.4881 |
Q.14 | An ontology-based knowledge management can reduce Management risk | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 23 | 27. 4 | 56 | 66.7 | 4.6071 |
Q.15 | ontology-based knowledge management can reduce Reputational risk | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11.9 | 25 | 29.8 | 49 | 58.3 | 4.4643 |
Total average | 4.167 | |||||||||