Table 2 Descriptive statistics for accountability procedures’ variables
ID | Statements | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | Mean | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Freq | % | Freq | % | Freq | % | Freq | % | |||
Q.5 | The usage of the ontological model refines sharing of information and semantics | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 29.8 | 59 | 70.2 | 4.7024 |
Q. 6 | The usage of the ontological model can support the development of a tax question-answering system | 0 | 0 | 31 | 36.9 | 42 | 50 | 11 | 13.1 | 3.7619 |
Q.7 | An ontology-based knowledge management can improve tax revenue with a high degree of transparency and accountability | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8.3 | 25 | 29.8 | 52 | 61.9 | 4.5357 |
Q.8 | ontology-based knowledge management Framework can help users in decreasing the cost of tax advisors and errors | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14.3 | 26 | 31 | 64 | 54.8 | 4.4048 |
Total average | 3.571 | |||||||||