Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of Principal Component Analysis & Item Inter-Correlation Analysis for Organisational Performance, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, and Competition Intensity (n = 115)

From: Customer accounting practices, antecedents and performance implications: insights from the financial services industry in Kuwait

Measures of Organisational Performance (OP1-OP6)

OP1

OP2

OP3

OP4

OP5

OP6

Factor Loading

OP1

1.000

     

.931

OP2

.932

1.000

    

.943

OP3

.825

.856

1.000

   

.927

OP4

.825

.845

.888

1.000

  

.943

OP5

.784

.799

.774

.855

1.000

 

.903

OP6

.794

.795

.795

.815

.803

1.000

.900

Explained Variance of Organisational Performance: 85.50%

Eigen-Value of Organisational Performance: 5.130

Determinant Significance of Organisational Performance: .000

Kaiser-M–O Measure of Sampling Adequacy for Organisational Performance: .89 (.000)

Measures of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty (PEU1—PEU5)

PEU1

PEU2

PEU3

PEU4

PEU5

Factor Loading

PEU1

1.000

    

.937

PEU2

.896

1.000

   

.957

PEU3

.850

.883

1.000

  

.938

PEU4

.834

.863

.850

1.000

 

.940

PEU5

.833

.864

.835

.877

1.000

.936

Explained Var. of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: 88.68%

Eigen-Value of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: 4.434

Determinant Significance of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: .002

K-M–O Meas. of Samp. Adequacy for Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: .91 (.000)

Measures of Competition Intensity (CI1—CI4)

CI1

CI2

CI3

CI4

Factor Loading

CI1

1.000

   

.959

CI2

.931

1.000

  

.963

CI3

.865

.878

1.000

 

.950

CI4

.870

.870

.890

1.000

.949

Explained Variance of Competition Intensity: 91.30%

Eigen-Value of Competition Intensity: 3.652

Determinant Significance of Competition Intensity: .005

Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy for Competition Intensity: .84 (.000)