From: Loan repayment among group borrowers in Tanzania: the role of relationship quality
Hypothesis | Regression path | Standardized regression weight | Standard Error (S.E.) | Critical ratio (C.R.) | Prob | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | COMT < – RQ | 0.161 | 0.072 | 3.460 | *** | Supported |
2 | TRUS < – RQ | 0.815 | 0.048 | 29.764 | *** | Supported |
3 | SATS < – RQ | 0.756 | 0.054 | 24.465 | *** | Supported |
4 | GLR < – RQ | 0.706 | 1.476 | 0.681 | 0.496 | Rejected |
4a | GLR < – COMT | −0.408 | 0.491 | −0.762 | 0.446 | Rejected |
4b | GLR < – TRUS | −0.508 | 0.501 | −0.827 | 0.408 | Rejected |
4c | GLR < – SATS | −0.377 | 0.492 | −0.627 | 0.531 | Rejected |