Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression results

From: Do related party transactions affect the relationship between political connections and firm value? Evidence from Egypt

Model

 

Unstandardized coefficients

Standardized coefficients

t

Sig.

 

B

Std. Error

Beta

Panel (A): the impact of PC on the FV

1

(Constant)

3.892

.668

 

5.822

.000

 

CEO_gender

1.111

.464

.131

2.394

.017

 

Board_size

− .020

.012

− .086

− 1.632

.104

 

CEO_duality

− .245

.120

− .109

− 2.043

.042

 

Board_Exper

.320

.124

.141

2.575

.011

 

Firm_Size

− .398

.101

− .215

− 3.957

.000

 

Profitability

.669

.364

.099

1.837

.067

 

Big4

.290

.130

.124

2.236

.026

 

Leverage

− .721

.318

− .120

− 2.269

.024

 

Political_Conne

.416

.124

.184

3.352

.001

Panel (B): the impact of RPTS on the FV

1

(Constant)

3.797

.667

 

5.696

.000

 

CEO_gender

.860

.457

.101

1.879

.061

 

Board_size

− .022

.012

− .096

− 1.835

.067

 

CEO_duality

− .278

.120

− .124

− 2.311

.022

 

Board_Exper

.305

.124

.134

2.463

.014

 

Firm_Size

− .304

.103

− .164

− 2.944

.003

 

Profitability

.675

.362

.100

1.863

.063

 

Big4

.328

.129

.140

2.549

.011

 

Leverage

− .732

.316

− .121

− 2.320

.021

 

Related_Party

− .483

.125

− .214

− 3.863

.000