Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression results of influencing role of managerial overconfidence in the relationship of corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance (TQ)

From: The impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance: the influences of managerial overconfidence

Variables

Firm performance (TQ)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

L.TQ

0.658***

0.658***

0.658***

0.659***

0.653***

0.661***

0.659***

(0.0274)

(0.0275)

(0.0275)

(0.0277)

(0.0270)

(0.0275)

(0.0276)

BIND

0.612

0.604

0.361

0.582

0.787

0.636

0.653

(1.425)

(1.425)

(2.528)

(1.425)

(1.415)

(1.422)

(1.425)

DUAL

0.0416

0.0401

0.0394

0.0598

0.0191

0.0440

0.0397

(0.125)

(0.125)

(0.125)

(0.219)

(0.125)

(0.125)

(0.125)

OWCON

0.0160***

0.0165***

0.0162***

0.0164***

0.0260***

0.0168***

0.0166***

(0.00403)

(0.00405)

(0.00405)

(0.00406)

(0.00626)

(0.00409)

(0.00402)

DF

− 0.712**

− 0.709**

− 0.711**

− 0.708**

− 0.747**

− 1.062**

− 0.705**

(0.325)

(0.326)

(0.327)

(0.326)

(0.325)

(0.492)

(0.326)

PMC

2.777***

2.775***

2.776***

2.789***

2.745***

2.778***

2.848***

(0.578)

(0.579)

(0.577)

(0.579)

(0.573)

(0.578)

(0.640)

MOC

 

− 0.00451

− 0.0150

0.0147

0.289

− 0.303**

− 0.00155

 

(0.0253)

(0.795)

(0.0619)

(0.252)

(0.139)

(0.0282)

FSIZE

− 0.169***

− 0.169***

− 0.169***

− 0.170***

− 0.174***

− 0.175***

− 0.169***

(0.0358)

(0.0358)

(0.0359)

(0.0357)

(0.0352)

(0.0355)

(0.0358)

FAGE

0.169**

0.168**

0.164**

0.165**

0.199***

0.174**

0.166**

(0.0680)

(0.0673)

(0.0638)

(0.0669)

(0.0619)

(0.0682)

(0.0676)

SGWTH

0.0482

0.0474

0.0459

0.0468

0.0411

0.0509

0.0482

(0.0630)

(0.0631)

(0.0636)

(0.0635)

(0.0632)

(0.0632)

(0.0631)

Moc*BIND

  

− 4.624*

    
  

(2.396)

    

Moc*DUAL

   

− 0.0672

   
   

(0.182)

   

Moc*OWCON

    

− 0.0156***

  
    

(0.00500)

  

Moc*DF

     

0.735**

 
     

(0.332)

 

Moc*PMC

      

− 0.0828

      

(0.363)

Constant

0

3.109***

0

3.134***

0

0

0

(0)

(0.955)

(0)

(0.961)

(0)

(0)

(0)

Industry and year dummies

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Observations

11,634

11,634

11,634

11,634

11,634

11,634

11,634

Number of firms

2,492

2,492

2,492

2,492

2,492

2,492

2,492

AR(1) test (p-value)

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

AR(2) test (p-value)

0.334

0.338

0.348

0.271

0.305

0.301

0.323

Hansen test of over identification

0.132

0.146

0.144

0.101

0.144

0.1658

0.126

Difference test of exogenous

0.151

0.181

0.190

0.123

0.188

0.185

0.192

  1. *, **&*** represent the statistical significance at 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively
  2. Notes This table reports the GMM regression results to capture the relationship of CG and firm performance, and interaction effect of MOC and CG on performance. Variables included in the model is described in Table 3, except dependent variable measured by Tobin’s Q (TQ)