Table 3 Rating and weight-scale for work-from-home for software professionals
Sl.no | Attributes rating | Enabler, Criteria and attributes weightage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For positive attributes | For negative attributes | |||||
Linguistic variable (Oijk) | Rating (Fuzzy scale) | Linguistic variable (Oijk) | Rating | Linguistic variable | Weightage (Wijk/Wij/Wi) (Fuzzy scale) | |
1 | Worst | 1 | Outstanding | 1 | No importance | 1 |
2 | Very very poor | 2 | Very very good | 2 | Very less important | 2 |
3 | Very poor | 3 | Very good | 3 | Less important | 3 |
4 | Poor | 4 | Good | 4 | Moderate important | 4 |
5 | Fair | 5 | Highly fair | 5 | Important | 5 |
6 | Highly fair | 6 | Fair | 6 | Highly important | 6 |
7 | Good | 7 | Poor | 7 | Very high important | 7 |
8 | Very good | 8 | Very poor | 8 | Very very high important | 8 |
9 | Very very good | 9 | Very very poor | 9 | Extremely important | 9 |
10 | Outstanding | 10 | Worst | 10 | Very extremely important | 10 |