The relationship between organizational environment antecedents and performance management in local government: evidence from Ghana

Future Business Journal

Table 9 Regression results with PM as a dependent variable

Model	B	T-STAT	p value	Summary Statistics
1				R = 0.526
(Constant)	2.697	12.586	0.000	R² = 0.276
STAKHOP	0.466	10.330	0.000	Adjusted R² = 0.273
POLSP	0.119	2.636	0.009	S.E. = 0.86004
				F stat = 80.735
				p value = 0.000
2
(Constant)	1.895	5.868	0.000	R = 0.559
STAKHOP	0.454	10.180	0.000	R² = 0.313
POLSP	0.130	2.889	0.004	Adjusted R² = 0.300
Age range	0.130	2.399	0.017	S.E. = 0.84397
Sex	0.135	2.270	0.001	F stat = 23.743
Education	− 0.02	− 0.464	0.643	p value = 0.000
Assembly size	0.070	1.688	0.092
Experience	− 0.034	− 0.635	0.526
Grade	− 0.055	− 1.326	0.186

^aPredictors: STAKHOP (stakeholder participation), POLSP (political support)
^bPredictors: POLSP, STAKHOP, education, assembly size, sex, grade, age range, experience
^cDependent variable: PM, r = correlation coefficient (standardized values): n = significant: ns = not significant;
^dN = 424