The relationship between organizational environment antecedents and performance management in local government: evidence from Ghana

Future Business Journal

Table 8 Regression results with PEREV as a dependent variable

Model	B	T-STAT	p value	Summary statistics
1				R = 0.516
(Constant)	2.003	8.105	0.000	R² = 0.266
STAKHOP	0.421	9.206	0.000	Adjusted R² = 0.263
POLSP	0.174	3.817	0.000	S.E. = 0.98435
				F stat = 75.938
				p value = 0.000
2
(Constant)	1.644	4.343	0.000	R = 0.531
STAKHOP	0.412	8.999	0.000	R² = 0.282
POLSP	0.171	3.687	0.000	Adjusted R² = 0.268
Age range	− 0.020	− 0.360	0.719	S.E. = 0.98097
Sex	0.119	2.803	0.005	F stat = 20.227
Education	− 0.016	− 0.343	0.732	p value = 0.000
Assembly Size	0.021	0.501	0.617
Experience	0.053	0.959	0.338
Grade	− 0.016	− 0.385	0.700

^aPredictors: political support, stakeholder participation
^bPredictors: POLSP (political support), STAKHOP (stakeholder participation), grade, assembly size, sex, education, experience, age range
^cDependent variable: PEREV (performance review): r = correlation coefficient (standardized values): n = significant: ns = not significant
^dN = 424