The relationship between organizational environment antecedents and performance management in local government: evidence from Ghana

Future Business Journal

Table 7 Regression results with PME as a dependent variable

Model	B	T-STAT	p value	Summary statistics
1				R = 0.457
(Constant)	3.358	14.343	0.000	R² = 0.208
STAKHOP	0.438	9.230	0.000	Adjusted R² = 0.204
POLSP	0.042	0.881	0.379	S.E. = 0.93836
				F stat = 55.172
				p value = 0.000
2
(Constant)	3.456	16.802	0.000	R = 0.455
STAKHOP	0.455	10.470	0.000	R² = 0.207
				Adjusted R² = 0.205
				S.E. = 0.93811
				F stat = 109.627
				p value = 0.000
3
(Constant)	2.174	6.763	0.000	R = 0.538
STAKHOP	0.452	10.870	0.000	R² = 0.290
Age range	0.262	4.766	0.000	Adjusted R² = 0.278
Sex	0.136	3.242	0.001	S.E. = 0.89413
Education	− 0.002	− 0.048	0.962	F stat = 24.146
Assembly size	0.117	2.780	0.006	p value = 0.000
Experience	− 0.123	− 2.225	0.027
Grade	− 0.078	− 1.853	0.065

^aDependent variable: PME: r = correlation coefficient (standardized values): n = significant: ns = not significant
^bPredictors: political support, stakeholder participation
^cPredictors: stakeholder participation
^dPredictors: stakeholder participation, age range, sex education, assembly size, grade, experience
^eN = 424