Skip to main content

Table 13 Organizational environment antecedents construct

From: The relationship between organizational environment antecedents and performance management in local government: evidence from Ghana

Variable

Sub-variable/indicator

Scale

No. of items

ORGENANTE 1

STAKHOP

STAKHOP1: Citizens participate in designing this assembly’s performance indicators

STAKHOP2: Elected officials participate in designing this assembly’s performance indicators

STAKHOP3: Citizens help this assembly to evaluate its performance

STAKHOP4: The assembly involves staff in designing performance indicators

STAKHOP5: Assembly staff are part of the performance evaluation process of this assembly

STAKHOP6: External stakeholders are familiar with the results of this assembly’s performance management goals

STAKHOP7: stakeholders trust the performance management system of this assembly

STAKHOP8: This assembly’s performance management helps communicate more effectively with elected officials and citizens

STAKHOP9: Staff are actively part of this assembly’s performance management process

STAKHOP10: Senior management is committed to this assembly’s performance management goals

STAKHOP11: Staff are committed to this assembly’s performance management policy

11

ORGENANTE 2

POLSP

POLSP1: This assembly has a low level of autonomy granted by elected officials

POLSP2: Compared with other MMAs, this assembly enjoys a high level of authority

POLSP3: The policy initiative or request from my assembly is not always supported by elected officials

POLSP4: Most elected officials in this district do not trust the assembly

POLSP5: Most elected officials are very critical of the assembly because the assembly is less effective

POLSP6: Elected officials support my organization with enough resources to implement training needs assessments of the assembly

POLSP7: Elected officials support my assembly with resources to implement performance management programs

7

Total ORGENANTE

STAKHOP + POLSP

 

11 + 7 = 18