From: Electronic payment adoption and consumers’ spending growth: empirical evidence from Nigeria
Model | R | R-square | Adjusted R-square | SE of the estimate |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | .335a | .112 | .096 | .71690 |
2 | .332b | .110 | .097 | .71671 |
ANOVAc | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F | Sig. |
1 | |||||
Regression | 25.482 | 7 | 3.640 | 7.083 | .000a |
Residual | 201.978 | 393 | .514 | ||
Total | 227.460 | 400 | |||
2 | |||||
Regression | 25.074 | 6 | 4.179 | 8.136 | .000b |
Residual | 202.385 | 394 | .514 | ||
Total | 227.460 | 400 |
Coefficientsc | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | t | Sig. | |
B | SE | Beta | |||
1 | |||||
(Constant) | 3.604 | .302 | 11.945 | .000 | |
Sex | .276 | .087 | .173 | 3.182 | .002 |
Age | − .147 | .069 | − .155 | − 2.146 | .032 |
Marital status | .032 | .103 | .021 | .313 | .755 |
Highest academic qualification | .065 | .069 | .045 | .939 | .348 |
Occupation status | − .179 | .032 | − .286 | − 5.635 | .000 |
Year of experience | .021 | .068 | .017 | .314 | .753 |
Monthly income | − .046 | .052 | − .048 | − .890 | .374 |
2 | |||||
(Constant) | 3.545 | .294 | 12.043 | .000 | |
Sex | .287 | .086 | .180 | 3.355 | .001 |
Age | − .160 | .067 | − .169 | − 2.380 | .018 |
Marital status | .029 | .103 | .019 | .281 | .779 |
Highest academic qualification | .061 | .069 | .043 | .887 | .376 |
Occupation status | − .175 | .031 | − .281 | − 5.571 | .000 |
Year of experience | .016 | .067 | .013 | .234 | .815 |
Excluded variablesc | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Beta In | t | Sig. | Partial correlation | Collinearity statistics |
Tolerance | |||||
2 | |||||
Monthly income | − .048d | − .890 | .374 | − .045 | .770 |